Remove 2.2

azure-pipelines.yml

@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ jobs:
       channels:
         - master
         - release/3.1.2xx
+        - 3.0
+        - 2.1
 
   # Windows x64 net461 micro benchmarks
   - template: /eng/performance/benchmark_jobs.yml
@@ -167,7 +169,6 @@ jobs:
         - master
         - release/3.1.2xx
         - 3.0
-        - 2.2
         - 2.1
 
   # Ubuntu 1804 x64 ML.NET benchmarks

docs/benchmarkdotnet.md

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ In order to build or run the benchmarks you will need the **.NET Core command-li
 
 ### Using .NET Cli
 
-To build the benchmarks you need to have the right `dotnet cli`. This repository allows to benchmark .NET Core 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0 and 5.0 so you need to install all of them.
+To build the benchmarks you need to have the right `dotnet cli`. This repository allows to benchmark .NET Core 2.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 5.0 so you need to install all of them.
 
 All you need to do is run the following command:
 
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ dotnet build -c Release
 If you don't want to install all of them and just run the benchmarks for selected runtime(s), you need to manually edit the [common.props](../build/common.props) file.
 
 ```diff
--<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp2.2;netcoreapp3.0</TargetFrameworks>
-+<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp3.0</TargetFrameworks>
+-<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp3.1;netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
++<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
 ```
 
 ### Using Python script
@@ -283,30 +283,30 @@ M00_L00:
 
 The `--runtimes` or just `-r` allows you to run the benchmarks for **multiple Runtimes**.
 
-Available options are: Mono, CoreRT, net461, net462, net47, net471, net472, netcoreapp2.1, netcoreapp2.2, netcoreapp3.0.
+Available options are: Mono, CoreRT, net461, net462, net47, net471, net472, netcoreapp2.1, netcoreapp3.0, netcoreapp3.1 and netcoreapp5.0.
 
-Example: run the benchmarks for .NET Core 2.2 and 3.0:
+Example: run the benchmarks for .NET Core 3.1 and 5.0:
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp2.2 --runtimes netcoreapp2.1 netcoreapp3.0
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.1 --runtimes netcoreapp3.1 netcoreapp5.0
 ```
 
-**Important: The host process needs to be the lowest common API denominator of the runtimes you want to compare!** In this case, it was`netcoreapp2.2`.
+**Important: The host process needs to be the lowest common API denominator of the runtimes you want to compare!** In this case, it was`netcoreapp3.1`.
 
 ## Regressions
 
 To perform a Mann–Whitney U Test and display the results in a dedicated column you need to provide the Threshold for Statistical Test via `--statisticalTest` argument. The value can be relative (5%) or absolute (10ms, 100ns, 1s)
 
-Example: run Mann–Whitney U test with relative ratio of 5% for `BinaryTrees_2` for .NET Core 2.1 (base) vs .NET Core 2.2 (diff). .NET Core 2.1 will be baseline because it was first.
+Example: run Mann–Whitney U test with relative ratio of 5% for `BinaryTrees_2` for .NET Core 3.1 (base) vs .NET Core 5.0 (diff). .NET Core 3.1 will be baseline because it was first.
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp2.1 --filter *BinaryTrees_2* --runtimes netcoreapp2.1 netcoreapp2.2 --statisticalTest 5%
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.1 --filter *BinaryTrees_2* --runtimes netcoreapp3.1 netcoreapp5.0 --statisticalTest 5%
 ```
 
 |        Method |     Toolchain |     Mean | MannWhitney(5%) |
 |-------------- |-------------- |---------:|---------------- |
-| BinaryTrees_2 | netcoreapp2.1 | 124.4 ms |            Base |
-| BinaryTrees_2 | netcoreapp2.2 | 153.7 ms |          Slower |
+| BinaryTrees_2 | netcoreapp3.1 | 124.4 ms |            Base |
+| BinaryTrees_2 | netcoreapp5.0 | 153.7 ms |          Slower |
 
 **Note:** to compare the historical results you need to use [Results Comparer](../src/tools/ResultsComparer/README.md)
 

docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ If profiling using the `--profiler ETW` is not enough, you should use a differen
 
 BenchmarkDotNet has some extra features that might be useful when doing performance investigation:
 
-- You can run the benchmarks against [multiple Runtimes](./benchmarkdotnet.md#Multiple-Runtimes). It can be very useful when the regression has been introduced between .NET Core releases, for example: between netcoreapp2.2 and netcoreapp3.0.
+- You can run the benchmarks against [multiple Runtimes](./benchmarkdotnet.md#Multiple-Runtimes). It can be very useful when the regression has been introduced between .NET Core releases, for example: between netcoreapp3.1 and netcoreapp5.0.
 - You can run the benchmarks using provided [dotnet cli](./benchmarkdotnet.md#dotnet-cli). You can download few dotnet SDKs, unzip them and just run the benchmarks to spot the version that has introduced the regression to narrow down your investigation.
 - You can run the benchmarks using few [CoreRuns](./benchmarkdotnet.md#CoreRun). You can build the latest [dotnet/runtime](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime) in Release, create a copy of the folder with CoreRun and use git to checkout an older commit. Then rebuild [dotnet/runtime](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime) and run the benchmarks against the old and new builds. This can narrow down your investigation to the commit that has introduced the bug.
 

scripts/benchmarks_ci.py

@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ def __main(args: list) -> int:
     )
 
     # WORKAROUND
-    # The MicroBenchmarks.csproj targets .NET Core 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.0
+    # The MicroBenchmarks.csproj targets .NET Core 2.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 5.0
     # to avoid a build failure when using older frameworks (error NETSDK1045:
     # The current .NET SDK does not support targeting .NET Core $XYZ)
     # we set the TFM to what the user has provided.

scripts/channel_map.py

@@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ class ChannelMap():
             'tfm': 'netcoreapp3.0',
             'branch': 'release/3.0'
         },
-        '2.2': {
-            'tfm': 'netcoreapp2.2',
-            'branch': 'release/2.2'
-        },
         'release/2.1.6xx': {
             'tfm': 'netcoreapp2.1',
             'branch': 'release/2.1.6xx'

scripts/dotnet.py

@@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ def __process_arguments(args: list):
     # TODO: Could pull this information from repository.
     SUPPORTED_CHANNELS = [
         'master',  # Default channel
-        '2.2',
         '2.1',
         'LTS',
     ]

src/benchmarks/micro/MicroBenchmarks.csproj

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
     <!-- Used by Python script to narrow down the specified target frameworks to test, and avoid downloading all supported SDKs -->
     <TargetFrameworks>$(PERFLAB_TARGET_FRAMEWORKS)</TargetFrameworks>
     <!-- Supported target frameworks -->
-    <TargetFrameworks Condition="'$(TargetFrameworks)' == '' AND '$(OS)' == 'Windows_NT'">net461;netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp2.2;netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
-    <TargetFrameworks Condition="'$(TargetFrameworks)' == ''">netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp2.2;netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
+    <TargetFrameworks Condition="'$(TargetFrameworks)' == '' AND '$(OS)' == 'Windows_NT'">net461;netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp3.1;netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
+    <TargetFrameworks Condition="'$(TargetFrameworks)' == ''">netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp3.1;netcoreapp5.0</TargetFrameworks>
 
     <OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
     <PlatformTarget>AnyCPU</PlatformTarget>

src/benchmarks/micro/README.md

@@ -12,38 +12,38 @@ To learn more about designing benchmarks, please read [Microbenchmark Design Gui
 
 ## Quick Start
 
-The first thing that you need to choose is the Target Framework. Available options are: `netcoreapp2.1|netcoreapp2.2|netcoreapp3.0|net461`. You can specify the target framework using `-f|--framework` argument. For the sake of simplicity, all examples below use `netcoreapp3.0` as the target framework.
+The first thing that you need to choose is the Target Framework. Available options are: `netcoreapp2.1|netcoreapp3.0|netcoreapp3.1|netcoreapp5.0|net461`. You can specify the target framework using `-f|--framework` argument. For the sake of simplicity, all examples below use `netcoreapp5.0` as the target framework.
 
 The following commands are run from the `src/benchmarks/micro` directory.
 
 To run the benchmarks in Interactive Mode, where you will be asked which benchmark(s) to run:
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.0
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp5.0
 ```
 
 To list all available benchmarks ([read more](../../../docs/benchmarkdotnet.md#Listing-the-Benchmarks)):
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.0 --list flat|tree
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp5.0 --list flat|tree
 ```
 
 To filter the benchmarks using a glob pattern applied to namespace.typeName.methodName ([read more](../../../docs/benchmarkdotnet.md#Filtering-the-Benchmarks)):
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.0 --filter *Span*
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp5.0 --filter *Span*
 ```
 
 To profile the benchmarked code and produce an ETW Trace file ([read more](../../../docs/benchmarkdotnet.md#Profiling)):
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.0 --filter $YourFilter --profiler ETW
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp5.0 --filter $YourFilter --profiler ETW
 ```
 
 To run the benchmarks for multiple runtimes ([read more](../../../docs/benchmarkdotnet.md#Multiple-Runtimes)):
 
 ```cmd
-dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp2.1 --filter * --runtimes netcoreapp2.1 netcoreapp3.0 corert
+dotnet run -c Release -f netcoreapp3.1 --filter * --runtimes netcoreapp3.1 netcoreapp5.0 corert
 ```
 
 ## Private Runtime Builds

src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Buffers/ReadOnlySequenceTests.cs

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ public class ReadOnlySequenceTests<T>
         [Benchmark(OperationsPerInvoke = 16)]
         public int FirstArray() => First(new ReadOnlySequence<T>(_array));
 
-#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2
+#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1
         [Benchmark(OperationsPerInvoke = 16)]
         public int FirstSpanArray() => FirstSpan(new ReadOnlySequence<T>(_array));
 

src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Collections/Contains/ContainsFalse.cs

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ public bool Array()
             return result;
         }
 
-#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2
+#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1
         [BenchmarkCategory(Categories.Span)]
         [Benchmark]
         public bool Span()

src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Collections/Contains/ContainsTrue.cs

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ public bool Array()
             return result;
         }
 
-#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2
+#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1
         [BenchmarkCategory(Categories.Span)]
         [Benchmark]
         public bool Span()

src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Linq/Perf.Enumerable.cs

@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ public IEnumerable<object> ElementAtArguments()
         [Benchmark]
         public void EmptyTakeSelectToArray() => Enumerable.Empty<int>().Take(10).Select(i => i).ToArray();
 
-#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 // API Available in .NET Core 3.0+
+#if !NETFRAMEWORK && !NETCOREAPP2_1 // API Available in .NET Core 3.0+
         // Append() has two execution paths: AppendPrependIterator (a result of another Append or Prepend) and IEnumerable, this benchmark tests both
         // https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/dcf1c8f51bcdbd79e08cc672e327d50612690a25/src/System.Linq/src/System/Linq/AppendPrepend.cs
         [Benchmark]

src/benchmarks/micro/runtime/BilinearInterpol/BilinearInterpol.cs

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 using System.Numerics;
 
 // HW Intrinsic APIs are available only in .NET Core 3.0+
-#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 && !NETFRAMEWORK
+#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETFRAMEWORK
 using System.Runtime.Intrinsics;
 using System.Runtime.Intrinsics.X86;
 #endif
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ private double[] BilinearInterpol_Vector(
         return z;
     }
 
-#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 && !NETFRAMEWORK
+#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETFRAMEWORK
     private static unsafe double[] BilinearInterpol_AVX(
                                             double[] x,
                                             double[] A,
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ private static unsafe double[] BilinearInterpol_AVX(
         }
         return z;
     }
-#endif // !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 && !NETFRAMEWORK
+#endif // !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETFRAMEWORK
 
     // This method is currently unused. It is useful, when generating a new vectorized version
     // of the benchmark (e.g. with a different set of HW intrinsics), to ensure that it is
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ public double[] Interpol_Vector()
         return vectorOutput;
     }
 
-#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 && !NETFRAMEWORK
+#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETFRAMEWORK
     [BenchmarkCategory(Categories.Runtime)]
     [Benchmark]
     public double[] Interpol_AVX()

src/benchmarks/micro/runtime/System.Reflection/Activator.cs

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ public class Activator<T>
         [Benchmark]
         public object CreateInstanceType() => System.Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T));
 
-#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 && !NETCOREAPP2_2 // API available in Full .NET Framework and .NET Core 3.0+
+#if !NETCOREAPP2_1 // API available in Full .NET Framework and .NET Core 3.0+
         [Benchmark]
         public object CreateInstanceNames() => System.Activator.CreateInstance(_assemblyName, _typeName);
 #endif

src/tools/ResultsComparer/README.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ It can be used to compare:
 * historical results (eg. before and after my changes)
 * results for different OSes (eg. Windows vs Ubuntu)
 * results for different CPU architectures (eg. x64 vs ARM64)
-* results for different target frameworks (eg. .NET Core 2.1 vs 2.2)
+* results for different target frameworks (eg. .NET Core 3.1 vs 5.0)
 
 All you need to provide is:
 * `--base` - path to folder/file with baseline results