Skip to content

Conversation

@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves: #33

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2025 12:06
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments, assume that content is reviewed in another PR

|
| Compare also `Gitub documentationt <https://docs.github.com/en>`_
| Depends on requirements management tooling, expect text based requirements.
| - review with (version management tool integrated) inspection checklist, only valid requirements get merged
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

propose to reformate, either as complete list or two separate sentences

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reformulated

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Contains still two S-CORE words

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

found (and removed) only one

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-cleaning-reqeng-from-tools-pmp-links branch from 9d008c5 to 1eca845 Compare September 29, 2025 13:12
@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit 770f255 into main Sep 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@masc2023 masc2023 deleted the aschemmel-tech-cleaning-reqeng-from-tools-pmp-links branch September 29, 2025 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Process should not mention concrete tools

3 participants