jsdoc types processing added, refs #88.

[Sozialarchiv]

With this pr a types file gets automatically generated during build.

[Sozialarchiv]

If you think the types are not specific enough (It is admittedly more of a workaround) I see two alternatives:

1. Migrate the project to typescript. I am willing to create a pr.
2. Create manuelle a types file. Personally, I think the first part is technically cleaner (danger of divergence), but I also understand if the project should remain js.

[neSpecc]

If you think the types are not specific enough (It is admittedly more of a workaround) I see two alternatives:

1. Migrate the project to typescript. I would willing to create a pr.
2. Create a types file. Personally, I think the first part is technically cleaner (danger of divergence), but I also understand if the project should remain js.

Your workaround is fine. Just update package.json to specify types file. Check this example: https://github.com/editor-js/header/blob/master/package.json#L19-L25

[Sozialarchiv]

Your workaround is fine. Just update package.json to specify types file. Check this example: https://github.com/editor-js/header/blob/master/package.json#L19-L25

A line with the types path should be already included in package.json. Or am I misunderstanding something?
https://github.com/editor-js/list/blob/bfa3e388978fc9fa1cc887c83fdfe89741b34045/package.json#L22

[neSpecc]

A line with the types path should be already included in package.json. Or am I misunderstanding something?

https://github.com/editor-js/list/blob/bfa3e388978fc9fa1cc887c83fdfe89741b34045/package.json#L22

You should also declare "types" property on the root level

[Sozialarchiv]

You should also declare "types" property on the root level

Thanks a lot. I added it.

[neSpecc]

update a patch version, please

[Sozialarchiv]

update a patch version, please

Done.

[Sozialarchiv]

Is there anything else to fix?

[neSpecc]

Thanks, @Sozialarchiv. Nice job. If you want to continue contributing, let me know

[Sozialarchiv]

@neSpecc

Thanks, @Sozialarchiv. Nice job. If you want to continue contributing, let me know

If you agree I would like to add this types-patch to the other core plugins without types. It is imho a pragmatic way to solve the missing types and it is wished by several people: codex-team/editor.js#2660

In addition my plan is to solve some smaller issues which were complained about by our users. There are already pull requests for some of them. I will test and give feedback there.

[Sozialarchiv]

I have seen that some plugins are already written in typescript. Alternatively, I can also make typescript migrations if desired. However, such migrations can lead to merge conflicts with existing pull requests, which may initially speak in favor of the jsdoc workaround.

[neSpecc]

@neSpecc

Thanks, @Sozialarchiv. Nice job. If you want to continue contributing, let me know

If you agree I would like to add this types-patch to the other core plugins without types. It is imho a pragmatic way to solve the missing types and it is wished by several people: codex-team/editor.js#2660

In addition my plan is to solve some smaller issues which were complained about by our users. There are already pull requests for some of them. I will test and give feedback there.

Let's add such patch to the Table block.

[Sozialarchiv]

Let's add such patch to the Table block.

editor-js/table#151