Fix swig check setup#862
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rahulporuri
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2021
Contributor
rahulporuri
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is pretty much what I had in mind and LGTM. Thanks @jvkersch
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @rahulporuri. Note: you'll have to merge the PR, since I don't have write access. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaces #861, via fork.
Instead of disabling the check for Swig altogether, just checks that Swig is installed, without checking the version.