Issue #405: expose get_forecast_type() to users#466
Conversation
seabbs
left a comment
seabbs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This all looks fine but we need to fix CI before we can merge this/review it properly
Fix failing CI issues by deleting code remnants that shouldn't be there anymore
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #466 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 80.93%
==========================================
Files ? 20
Lines ? 1715
Branches ? 0
==========================================
Hits ? 1388
Misses ? 327
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Merged in CI fix - merging #468 into the develop branch should resolve future CI issues |
|
Should be good for review now :) |
|
Can you formally ping when ready as it is easier to find vs sorting through all the notifications. |
seabbs
left a comment
seabbs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks fine. For safety I would merge in the GH actions fix first. Looks like yet again some random unrelated and undocumented changes in this PR.
| ) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # ============================================================================== | ||
| # `get_forecast_type` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why don't these get functions just have there own test file?
| correlation <- function(scores, | ||
| metrics = NULL, | ||
| digits = NULL) { | ||
| metrics <- check_metrics(metrics) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this unrelated to this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, but I noted this! 🥺 🐶 It's mentioned in the PR description and you asked me to fix these 🐩
2 participants
Update: Tests are now succeeding apart from R3.5 (see #483) and pkgdown (see #482)
Closes #405.
The function
get_forecast_type()infers the forecast type based on the input data (a data.frame). This function might potentially be useful to users, so this PRNote: checks were failing due to the issue explained in #468 (i.e. there are two rogue lines of code (
check_metrics()and a test withscoresinstead ofscores_quantilethat make tests fail).