🔖 release: mobile@1.1.19, server@0.2.69#806
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
WalkthroughRemoved three Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @cruzdanilo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request automates the release of the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a standard release update for @exactly/server to version 0.2.69. The changes include updating the CHANGELOG.md with the latest patch notes and bumping the version in package.json. The changeset file is correctly removed as part of the release process. No technical issues or improvements were identified in these administrative changes.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #806 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.20% 70.25% +1.05%
==========================================
Files 208 208
Lines 7147 7673 +526
Branches 2267 2468 +201
==========================================
+ Hits 4946 5391 +445
- Misses 2013 2065 +52
- Partials 188 217 +29
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
0a1c21d to
5f1a5b7
Compare
346c455 to
4c89dfd
Compare
4c89dfd to
e212c86
Compare
e212c86 to
25e03d2
Compare
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@exactly/mobile@1.1.19
Patch Changes
#811
74e5a0fThanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 name and fingerprint warning-level reportsUpdated dependencies [
6b15e0a,2cc0413,77098a5,bd0caf0,55ccd09]:@exactly/server@0.2.69
Patch Changes
#805
6b15e0aThanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 handle timelocked proposal reverts#808
2cc0413Thanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 capture proposal reverts as warnings#813
77098a5Thanks @mainqueg! - 🐛 prefer latest document for manteca#811
bd0caf0Thanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 name and fingerprint warning-level exceptions#809
55ccd09Thanks @aguxez! - 🐛 fix timestamp key typo in activity