Skip to content

Conversation

@tausbn
Copy link
Contributor

@tausbn tausbn commented Nov 20, 2019

Having toString() defined to be none() is a major headache when debugging,
as toString-less results are silently elided. This PR puts dummy toStrings
in place of the none()s.

(I am mostly creating this to see if it impacts our tests and/or the
performance. If not, we may as well merge it.)

Having `toString()` defined to be `none()` is a major headache when debugging,
as `toString`-less results are silently elided. This PR puts dummy `toString`s
in place of the `none()`s.

(I am mostly creating this to see if it impacts our tests and/or the
performance. If not, we may as well merge it.)
@tausbn
Copy link
Contributor Author

tausbn commented Nov 21, 2019

No impact on performance or alerts: https://git.semmle.com/gist/taus/664814474a8c734024176b483b4a7413

@tausbn tausbn requested a review from RasmusWL November 21, 2019 10:36
@tausbn tausbn added the Python label Nov 21, 2019
@tausbn tausbn marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2019 10:36
@tausbn tausbn requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2019 10:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants