[prompt-clustering] Copilot Agent Prompt Clustering Analysis - 2026-03-19 #21791
Replies: 5 comments
-
|
🤖 The smoke test agent was here! 👋 Dropping by to confirm all systems are operational. The automated smoke test is running and this is our little flag in the digital sand. 🚩 beep boop - smoke test in progress ✨
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🎉 The smoke test agent returns with a victory lap! 🏎️💨 All systems green (well, mostly — Serena was playing hide and seek 🙈). The haiku has been dispatched, the build has been built, the playwright has played, and the web has been fetched. Another glorious smoke test in the books! 📚✨ exits with a bow 🤖🎭
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🤖 Smoke test agent was here! Testing GitHub discussions interaction — all systems nominal. The bots are watching. 👀
Note 🔒 GitHub Guard filtered 1 itemThe GitHub Guard activated and filtered the following item during workflow execution.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
💥 KABLAM!! 🦸 ZAP! POW! WHOOSH! The smoke test agent has ARRIVED — and this discussion cannot contain the sheer POWER of Claude's agentic capabilities! ⚡ RUN 23296588401 — ALL SYSTEMS GO! Claude swoops in, compiles the build in a single bound, searches the codebase at the speed of light, and pushes to the PR branch before you can say "GitHub Agentic Workflows"! 🎉 SMOKE TEST: PASSED — Now back to the Bat-cave!
Note 🔒 GitHub Guard filtered 1 itemThe GitHub Guard activated and filtered the following item during workflow execution.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Agent Prompt Clustering Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #21958. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Cluster Overview
test, workflow, pkg, issueissue, workflow, title, issue titlemcp, server, mcp server, gatewayagentic, agentic workflows, md, workflowssafe, safe outputs, outputs, safe outputreference, fix, debug, testscampaign, security, issue, projectproject, update, create, safejob, fix, failing, idCluster Details & Representative Examples
Cluster 3: General Development & Feature Additions
test, workflow, pkg, issue, files, addRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 7: CI/Issue-Driven Automated Fixes
issue, workflow, title, issue title, agent, workflowsRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 6: MCP Server & Gateway Tasks
mcp, server, mcp server, gateway, mcp gateway, toolRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 2: Agentic Workflow Infrastructure
agentic, agentic workflows, md, workflows, workflow, createRepresentative Examples:
@copilotto workflow sync issues when agent tokeCluster 1: Safe Outputs & Compiler Improvements
safe, safe outputs, outputs, safe output, output, createRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 4: Bug Fixes & Test Failures
reference, fix, debug, tests, review, failedRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 9: Campaign Management
campaign, security, issue, project, comments, idRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 5: Campaign/Project State & URLs
project, update, create, safe, status, urlRepresentative Examples:
Cluster 8: Fix Failing CI Jobs
job, fix, failing, id, workflow, causeRepresentative Examples:
Key Findings
Highest Success Rate: Fix Failing CI Jobs at 81.2% merged (32 tasks). These focused, scoped tasks have clear objectives and tend to be straightforward for the agent to complete.
Lowest Success Rate: CI/Issue-Driven Automated Fixes at 57.3% merged (143 tasks). These tasks may have vague or complex requirements derived from automated issue templates.
Largest Category: General Development & Feature Additions accounts for 37.1% (368 tasks) of all work — a broad category that likely includes a mix of task types and could benefit from further subdivision.
MCP tasks are larger but lower success: MCP Server tasks average 38.2 files changed per PR (highest complexity), yet achieve only 64.0% success — suggesting MCP-related changes require more careful scoping.
Campaign tasks are split: Campaigns appear in two clusters (management vs. project URLs), suggesting a natural split in task types within the campaign system.
Recommendations
Improve CI/Issue-Driven prompts: The lowest-success cluster (CI/issue-driven) uses auto-generated templates. Adding more context (failing test output, expected vs actual) to issue templates could improve agent success rates.
Scope MCP tasks more narrowly: MCP server/gateway tasks change many files. Breaking them into smaller, targeted PRs (e.g., separate update from validation) could improve success rates.
Template for "Fix Failing CI" prompts: The highest-success cluster uses structured prompts with specific job names and log references. Standardizing this pattern across other fix tasks could lift overall success rates.
Refine the General Development cluster: With 37% of all tasks, this cluster is too broad for actionable insights. Adding task-type labels (feature, refactor, chore) to PRs would enable finer analysis.
Full PR Data Table (200 Most Recent of 993 Tasks)
Showing 200 most recent PRs. Total analyzed: 993.
References: Workflow Run §23294791425
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions