fix: apply configured reviewers when creating pull request via safe output

[Copilot]

reviewers configured in safe-outputs.create-pull-request were correctly serialized into GH_AW_SAFE_OUTPUTS_HANDLER_CONFIG by the Go compiler but silently ignored by create_pull_request.cjs — the handler never read config.reviewers or called requestReviewers.

Changes

• create_pull_request.cjs

  • Extract configReviewers from config.reviewers at factory init (same pattern as envLabels)
  • After PR creation and label assignment, call pulls.requestReviewers with configured reviewers
  • Handle copilot reviewer separately, mapping it to copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] (mirrors add_reviewer.cjs behavior)
  • Reviewer API errors emit a warning rather than failing the step — PR creation still succeeds

• create_pull_request.test.cjs — new test suite covering:

  • Regular reviewer list applied to the created PR
  • copilot reviewer triggers a separate requestReviewers call with the bot username
  • No requestReviewers call when no reviewers configured
  • Graceful warning on API failure
  • Comma-separated string parsed the same as an array

Example config that now works end-to-end

safe-outputs:
  create-pull-request:
    draft: false
    labels: [status-update]
    reviewers: [alondahari, copilot]

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds support for applying configured reviewers when creating a pull request via safe output, fixing a bug where the reviewers config was serialized but never read or acted upon.

Changes:

• Extract and apply configReviewers from config in create_pull_request.cjs, with special handling for the copilot reviewer (mapped to bot username)
• Add comprehensive test coverage for the new reviewer functionality

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
actions/setup/js/create_pull_request.cjs	Add reviewer request logic after PR creation, consistent with add_reviewer.cjs patterns
actions/setup/js/create_pull_request.test.cjs	New test suite covering reviewer assignment scenarios

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

[pelikhan]

@copilot add logging with code.info

[Copilot]

@copilot add logging with code.info

Added pre-action core.info before each requestReviewers call (e.g. Requesting 2 reviewer(s) for pull request #42: ["user1","user2"]) and kept the post-success info log. Done in 574f9ca.