Evn validation 1403

[evanyang1]

Fixes #1403

What changes did you make and why did you make them ?

• When editing the event, the names will be validated. If the meeting contains 'meeting', 'mtg', or the project name itself, the validation code will reject those changes.
• I wrote a new util function that serves the task: It returns true if a string contains any of the 'words' in an array.

Screenshots of Proposed Changes Of The Website (if any, please do not screen shot code changes)

Details

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b evanyang1-evn-validation-1403 development
git pull https://github.com/evanyang1/VRMS.git evn-validation-1403

[trillium]

Hey Evan,

Can you add a bit of context on the changes you've made to the codebase and why they've been made?

I know that we have the issue markes, and that you've referenced them within this PR, but it's good practice to put a summary together so that whoever is reviewing it has an easier time following along with the changes you've submitted.

[evanyang1]

@spiteless I used a slightly different approach to address your comments. I tested it and it works still.

[jbubar]

This is great! I pulled it and it looks good

pic of it live

[trillium]

Hey @evanyang1 , looks like merging is blocked becasue I requested changes and haven't come back yet to remove that change request. My bad.

Combing back through the PR I see that you addressed getting the form submission issue that was cropping up.

Looks like edits to yarn.lock are still in this pull request, can you please remove those, the changes you've made shouldn't effect that file

[evanyang1]

Ok that should do the trick.

[trillium]

Great job, thanks for rebasing and dropping yarn lock. We've got a few PRs that all tackle this similar issue so stitching them together will be it's own beast, but this code works. Thanks @evanyang1 !

[trillium]

Looking for a few more eyes on this if someone else has time. I'm happy with it's current state

[MattPereira]

@evanyang1 well done sanitizing the meeting name input according to the requirements of the issue!