Remove BoP from untaggedRepoIds in get-project-data.js

[roslynwythe]

Dependency

• Update wiki page for GitHub Action: github-data #6643

Overview

We need to remove the BOP repo from the list of untagged repos in get-project-data.js and to perform testing to confirm that language and contributor data are still pulled from repository and displayed on the BOP project page.

Details

In the past, the BOP repo was was identified as an "untagged" repo in github-actions/trigger-schedule/github-data/get-project-data.js and was located at https://github.com/codeforamerica/brigade-playbook. It has now been moved to the Civic Tech Index organization and has been tagged with the topic tag hack-for-la.

github-actions/trigger-schedule/github-data/get-project-data.js runs as part of .github/workflows/schedule-daily-1100.yml and updates the file _data/external/github-data.json with contributor and language data for each project.

Action Items

• In github-actions/trigger-schedule/github-data/get-project-data.js remove the id 277577906 from the untaggedRepoIds array.
• Remove the comment containing the id 277577906
• This code runs as part of a GHA workflow that updates the file data/external/github-data.json, and testing should be performed to verify that after update, data stored in github-data.json is unchanged and that the language and contributor data stored on the BOP project page are unchanged. It will be necessary to test the code in your fork of the hackforla/website repository. Testing will require a token which is described in "Tip 7" in The "Hack for LA's GitHub Actions" Wiki guide needs additional explanation #6537 (comment). For further testing guidance, see GitHub Actions- "Schedule Daily 1100" workflow

Resources/Instructions

• Revised: Tip 7 Using Personal Access Tokens to test in your own repository - The "Hack for LA's GitHub Actions" Wiki guide needs additional explanation #6537 (comment)
• See GitHub Actions- "Schedule Daily 1100" workflow for specific instructions for testing
• BOP project page

[t-will-gillis]

Hi @roslynwythe I added ready for dev lead and put this in "New Issue Approval" only so it does not get lost, but of course feel free to label or move it as you think...