Conversation
fasterit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you very much for cleaning up. Much appreciated!
Can we have these in StringUtils please?
Nobody would expect them in XAlloc.
|
Given the naming I somewhat expected them to be there. Inside I could rename and move them over to |
I did a dryrun with just moving these functions (without rename) and that patch already causes quite a disruption. And with proper renaming (which IMHO should be done when moving these functions over to Thus I'd prefer to go along with #155 as-is for now. |
f4974d5 to
86f5f13
Compare
This issue was previously hidden as xSnprintf expanded to only one large command that didn't trigger the GCC formatting check.
This cleans up some of the mess in
XAlloc.h…This also fixes an argument list issue the original macro had (
bufwas missing and wrongly labelledfmt).