Suggested changes for Section "Energy end-use" and " Socio-economic"#35
Merged
jkikstra merged 3 commits intoiiasa:2019-updatefrom Oct 15, 2019
guofei2016:Revision_Fei
Merged
Suggested changes for Section "Energy end-use" and " Socio-economic"#35jkikstra merged 3 commits intoiiasa:2019-updatefrom guofei2016:Revision_Fei
jkikstra merged 3 commits intoiiasa:2019-updatefrom
guofei2016:Revision_Fei
Conversation
…ment" 1) minor language editing and typo correction 2) term consistency (like MESSAGE and MESSAGEix, etc.)
jkikstra
reviewed
Oct 10, 2019
| Energy end-use | ||
| ================= | ||
| MESSAGE distinguishes three energy end-use sectors, i.e. transport, residential/commercial (also referred to as the buildings sector) and industry. Given the long-term nature of the scenarios, the model version used for the SSPs, represents these end-use sectors in a stylized way. For more detailed short-term analysis, a model version with a more detailed transport sector module that distinguishes different transport modes, vehicle classes amd consumer types exists (McCollum et al., 2016 :cite:`mccollum_transport_2016`). | ||
| MESSAGEix distinguishes three energy end-use sectors, i.e. transport, residential/commercial (also referred to as the buildings sector) and industry. Given the long-term nature of the scenarios, the model version used for the SSPs, represents these end-use sectors in a stylized way. For more detailed short-term analysis, a model version with a more detailed transport sector module that distinguishes different transport modes, vehicle classes amd consumer types exists (McCollum et al., 2016 :cite:`mccollum_transport_2016`). |
jkikstra
reviewed
Oct 10, 2019
Contributor
jkikstra
left a comment
jkikstra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great, thanks @guofei2016 for making these improvements and changing the branch.
I've noticed one tiny typo (see comment in enduse/index), but everything else looks ready for a merge.
jkikstra
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2019
Contributor
jkikstra
left a comment
jkikstra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @guofei2016, looks all good to me!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
replacing the previous PR #30, and now merge to the right branch 2019-update