Skip to content

Add logger fixture for push policy tests#121

Merged
leynos merged 5 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-tests-for-dropiffull-and-warnanddropiffull-policies
Jun 26, 2025
Merged

Add logger fixture for push policy tests#121
leynos merged 5 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-tests-for-dropiffull-and-warnanddropiffull-policies

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jun 23, 2025

Summary

  • ensure push queue policy tests use a logger fixture for exclusive access
  • keep drop and warn policies as separate tests

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test
  • markdownlint --fix *.md **/*.md (fails: violations in existing files)
  • nixie docs/rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures.md

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6859b5beecc0832292e48a740eb40b9a

Summary by Sourcery

Integrate the logtest crate and a LoggerHandle fixture to enable exclusive, verifiable log capture in push queue policy tests and update documentation accordingly

New Features:

  • Introduce a global LoggerHandle fixture using logtest for exclusive log capture in rstest tests

Enhancements:

  • Add a dedicated logtest section to the Rust testing guide for verifying log output

Build:

  • Add logtest as a dev-dependency in Cargo.toml

Documentation:

  • Document logtest usage and setup in the rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures guide

Tests:

  • Add async push policy tests that verify DropIfFull and WarnAndDropIfFull behavior with log assertions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added new tests to verify push queue policies, including log output assertions for different queue behaviours.
  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation to introduce the use of the logtest crate for verifying log output during tests, with usage examples and setup instructions.
  • Chores
    • Added logtest as a development dependency.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR integrates the logtest crate to provide an exclusive rstest logger fixture, applies it in new async push policy tests to assert on log behavior, adds logtest as a dev-dependency, and updates the testing guide with a dedicated logtest section.

Class diagram for the new logger fixture and push policy tests

classDiagram
    class LoggerHandle {
        +Logger logger
        +fn start() -> LoggerHandle
        +fn pop() -> Option<LogRecord>
    }
    class DropIfFullPolicy {
        +fn push(item) -> Result
    }
    class WarnAndDropIfFullPolicy {
        +fn push(item) -> Result
    }
    class PushPolicyTest {
        +fn test_drop_policy_uses_logger()
        +fn test_warn_and_drop_policy_uses_logger()
    }
    LoggerHandle <|-- PushPolicyTest
    DropIfFullPolicy <|-- PushPolicyTest
    WarnAndDropIfFullPolicy <|-- PushPolicyTest
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduce a logtest-based rstest fixture for exclusive logger capture
  • Define LoggerHandle with a static OnceLock<Mutex> for single-instance logging
  • Implement Deref and DerefMut to provide Logger access via LoggerHandle
  • Add a rstest fixture logger that initializes and cleans the logger before each test
tests/push_policies.rs
Add push queue policy tests using the new logger fixture
  • Write an async test for the DropIfFull policy asserting no log is emitted
  • Write an async test for the WarnAndDropIfFull policy asserting a warning log
  • Inject the logger fixture into both tests to capture and verify log records
tests/push_policies.rs
Register logtest as a development dependency
  • Add logtest = "^2.0" under [dev-dependencies] in Cargo.toml
Cargo.toml
Document logtest usage in testing guide
  • Insert a new 'logtest' section with installation and setup instructions
  • Provide example code for starting a Logger and asserting on logged records
  • Reflow section headings to accommodate the new logtest entry
docs/rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@leynos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 68b8462 and 7ea9d9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/push_policies.rs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

A new development dependency, logtest, is added to the project configuration. Documentation is updated to introduce logtest for verifying log output in tests. A new test module is created to validate push queue policies, using logtest to assert logging behaviour when queues are full.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Cargo.toml Added logtest as a development dependency.
docs/rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures.md Replaced a section to introduce logtest for log assertions in tests; updated instructions.
tests/push_policies.rs New test module for push queue policies; uses logtest to verify log output and queue logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant Logger as logtest::Logger
    participant Queue as PushQueue

    Test->>Logger: Start logger
    Test->>Queue: Push item (high/low priority)
    Test->>Queue: Push another item (DropIfFull/WarnAndDropIfFull)
    Queue-->>Logger: Emit warning (if WarnAndDropIfFull)
    Test->>Logger: Assert log records
    Test->>Queue: Assert queue contents
Loading

Poem

In the land of logs and queues so bright,
A rabbit tests with all its might.
With logtest now upon the scene,
It checks what’s logged and what’s unseen.
Push policies tested, warnings caught—
Hopping forward, bugs are fought!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch codex/add-tests-for-dropiffull-and-warnanddropiffull-policies

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • In LoggerHandle::new, you call Logger::start() inside the Once block but discard its return value and then do let mut logger = Logger;—you should capture and return the Logger from Logger::start() to ensure proper log isolation.
  • Maintaining a manual tokio::runtime fixture adds boilerplate—consider marking the tests async with #[tokio::test] (or using rstest’s async support) to eliminate block_on and simplify the test code.
  • The logtest = "2" entry in Cargo.toml is too loose; pinning to a more specific version range (e.g. ^2.0) will guard against unintended breaking changes.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- In `LoggerHandle::new`, you call `Logger::start()` inside the `Once` block but discard its return value and then do `let mut logger = Logger;`—you should capture and return the Logger from `Logger::start()` to ensure proper log isolation.
- Maintaining a manual `tokio::runtime` fixture adds boilerplate—consider marking the tests `async` with `#[tokio::test]` (or using rstest’s async support) to eliminate `block_on` and simplify the test code.
- The `logtest = "2"` entry in Cargo.toml is too loose; pinning to a more specific version range (e.g. `^2.0`) will guard against unintended breaking changes.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Jun 24, 2025

@sourcery-ai review

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Jun 24, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 24, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a475af and 68b8462.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • docs/rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures.md (1 hunks)
  • tests/push_policies.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (1)

18-18: LGTM: Appropriate dev dependency addition.

The logtest dependency is correctly placed in [dev-dependencies] with a sensible version constraint that allows compatible updates within major version 2.

docs/rust-testing-with-rstest-fixtures.md (1)

1240-1263: Excellent documentation addition for logtest integration.

The new section provides clear, practical guidance on using logtest with rstest for verifying log output. The examples are well-structured and the explanation of complementary usage with rstest is helpful.

tests/push_policies.rs (2)

40-53: Comprehensive test for DropIfFull policy.

This test effectively verifies that the DropIfFull policy discards frames without logging warnings. The test setup, execution, and assertions are well-structured and clearly validate the expected behaviour.


55-71: Thorough verification of WarnAndDropIfFull logging behaviour.

This test excellently validates both the functional behaviour (frame discarding) and the logging side effect (warning message) of the WarnAndDropIfFull policy. The log message content assertion using contains("push queue full") provides appropriate validation without being overly brittle.

Comment thread tests/push_policies.rs
Comment thread tests/push_policies.rs
@leynos leynos merged commit faffdbe into main Jun 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/add-tests-for-dropiffull-and-warnanddropiffull-policies branch June 26, 2025 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant