Skip to content

Add doc comments for push tests#201

Closed
leynos wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-comprehensive-doc-comments-to-tests
Closed

Add doc comments for push tests#201
leynos wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-comprehensive-doc-comments-to-tests

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 11, 2025

Summary

  • document push queue tests
  • expand push policy test docs
  • improve wireframe_testing logging docs
  • place docs before function attributes

Testing

  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68704f8b047c83228f77d571ea0d49ad

Summary by Sourcery

Add comprehensive documentation comments and examples for logging utilities and push queue tests, and reorganize doc placement for clarity.

Enhancements:

  • Move documentation comments before function attributes in test fixtures

Documentation:

  • Add usage examples and API docs for LoggerHandle in logging.rs
  • Document push queue test cases with descriptive comments in push.rs
  • Expand documentation for push policy tests and DLQ behaviors in push_policies.rs
  • Improve overall wireframe_testing logging documentation

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR enriches documentation by adding and repositioning doc comments across the logging module and test suites, providing usage examples for logger utilities and clear descriptions for each push and policy test.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Improved doc comments in logging module
  • Added usage examples for logger() and LoggerHandle::new()
  • Clarified acquisition methods in LoggerHandle docs
  • Moved doc comments before function attributes
wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
Documented push queue tests
  • Prepended each async test with a brief description of its behavior
  • Described routing, policy, rate limiting, error, and burst scenarios in tests
tests/push.rs
Expanded push policy test documentation
  • Added comments for parameterized policy behaviors and DLQ interactions
  • Documented helper functions for DLQ setup and assertion
tests/push_policies.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added detailed doc comments to test files, clarifying the intent and behaviour of each test and helper function.
    • Enhanced module-level documentation and usage examples for logging utilities, including public structs and methods.
    • No functional changes were introduced; updates are limited to explanatory comments and documentation improvements.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added descriptive comments to test functions and helpers to clarify their intent and behaviour.
    • Enhanced documentation for the logging module and logger handle, including practical usage examples for capturing and asserting logs in tests.
    • No changes to application functionality or logic; updates are limited to explanatory comments and documentation improvements.

Walkthrough

Add descriptive doc comments to test functions, fixtures, and helper methods in tests/push.rs, tests/push_policies.rs, and the wireframe_testing::logging module. Enhance documentation with usage examples and clarifying comments. Make no functional or logic changes; restrict modifications to documentation and comments only.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/push.rs Add doc comments to each test function, clarifying purpose and behaviour of push queue tests.
tests/push_policies.rs Add doc comments to test fixtures, helpers, and test cases; clarify intent and behaviour of each.
wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs Enhance module, struct, and function docs; add usage examples for LoggerHandle and logger(); add clarifying comments.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

📚
Doc comments bloom where code once lay bare,
Tests now whisper what, when, and where.
From push to DLQ, intent is revealed,
With logging examples, clarity sealed.
No logic disturbed, just stories unfurled—
Documentation brightens the developer’s world!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/add-comprehensive-doc-comments-to-tests

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (1)

67-73: Replace the forbidden #[allow] with a scoped #[expect].

#[allow] violates the project lint policy. Use #[expect] and scope it to the single lint.

-#[allow(
-    unused_braces,
-    reason = "rustc false positive for single line rstest fixtures"
-)]
+#[expect(unused_braces, reason = "rustc false positive for single-line rstest fixture")]
tests/push_policies.rs (1)

14-18: Replace #[allow] with #[expect] to satisfy lint policy.

Same rationale as in logging.rs.

-#[allow(
-    unused_braces,
-    reason = "rustc false positive for single line rstest fixtures"
-)]
+#[expect(unused_braces, reason = "rustc false positive for single-line rstest fixture")]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ea1710 and 01b3c2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/push.rs (8 hunks)
  • tests/push_policies.rs (5 hunks)
  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.rs`: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, o...

**/*.rs: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, or complexity. Don't echo the obvious.
Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.
Function documentation must include clear examples.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • tests/push.rs
  • tests/push_policies.rs
  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
`**/*.rs`: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12...

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • tests/push.rs
  • tests/push_policies.rs
  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 240000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
tests/push.rs (8)

9-10: Doc comment reads well.

No issues spotted.


26-27: Doc comment reads well.


42-43: Doc comment reads well.


56-57: Doc comment reads well.


92-93: Doc comment reads well.


106-108: Doc comment reads well.


127-129: Doc comment reads well.


141-143: Doc comment reads well.

tests/push_policies.rs (7)

27-38: Doc comment reads well.


69-86: Doc comment reads well.


88-92: Doc comment reads well.


93-95: Doc comment reads well.


97-103: Doc comment reads well.


105-107: Doc comment reads well.


108-123: Doc comment reads well.

Comment thread wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
Comment thread wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
Comment thread wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (1)

70-74: Replace forbidden #[allow] with #[expect] and add an # Examples section.

The coding guidelines disallow #[allow]; use #[expect(lint)] to keep the lint active while acknowledging the known false positive. Also include an example block for consistency with other public items.

-#[allow(
-    unused_braces,
-    reason = "rustc false positive for single line rstest fixtures"
-)]
+#[expect(unused_braces, reason = "rustc false positive for single-line rstest fixture")]
+/// rstest fixture returning a [`LoggerHandle`] for log assertions.
+///
+/// # Examples
+/// ```
+/// use wireframe_testing::logger;
+///
+/// let mut log = logger();
+/// log::error!("demo");
+/// assert!(log.pop().is_some());
+/// ```
 #[fixture]
 pub fn logger() -> LoggerHandle { LoggerHandle::new() }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01b3c2c and 3bc034f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.rs`: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, o...

**/*.rs: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, or complexity. Don't echo the obvious.
Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.
Function documentation must include clear examples.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
`**/*.rs`: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12...

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 240000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (2)

6-17: Remove the #[tokio::test] attribute from the doctest.

rustdoc injects its own test harness. Attribute macros such as #[tokio::test] are rejected in that context and make the doctest fail to compile. Either drop the attribute or add , no_run to the code-block fence so the snippet is compiled but not executed.

-//! #[tokio::test]
-//! async fn logs_are_collected() {
+//! // async context
+//! # #[tokio::main] //     <-- hides in rendered docs but compiles
+//! # async fn main() {
 //!     let mut log = logger();
 //!     log::info!("example");
 //!     assert!(log.pop().is_some());
 //! }
-//! ```
+//! # }
+//! ```

42-49: Good addition of example section for new().

The method is now documented in line with std-lib style. No further action required.

Comment on lines +26 to 37
/// serialising access to a [`logtest::Logger`]. Acquire it using [`logger`] or
/// [`LoggerHandle::new`].
///
/// # Examples
/// ```
/// use wireframe_testing::logger;
///
/// let mut log = logger();
/// log::warn!("warned");
/// assert!(log.pop().is_some());
/// ```
pub struct LoggerHandle {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add the missing # Examples macro import or silence the unused-imports lint.

log::warn! expands to a macro call and triggers the unused_imports lint in doctests when log is not imported explicitly. Import log (hidden with #) to satisfy the lint and keep the rendered docs clean.

 /// ```
 /// use wireframe_testing::logger;
+/// # use log::warn;
 ///
 /// let mut log = logger();
-/// log::warn!("warned");
+/// warn!("warned");
 /// assert!(log.pop().is_some());
 /// ```
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// serialising access to a [`logtest::Logger`]. Acquire it using [`logger`] or
/// [`LoggerHandle::new`].
///
/// # Examples
/// ```
/// use wireframe_testing::logger;
///
/// let mut log = logger();
/// log::warn!("warned");
/// assert!(log.pop().is_some());
/// ```
pub struct LoggerHandle {
/// serialising access to a [`logtest::Logger`]. Acquire it using [`logger`] or
/// [`LoggerHandle::new`].
///
/// # Examples
///
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs around lines 26 to 37, the doctest uses the
macro log::warn! without importing the log crate, which triggers the
unused_imports lint. Fix this by adding a hidden import of the log crate in the
doctest with `# use log::warn;` before using the warn! macro, and replace
`log::warn!` with just `warn!` to keep the documentation clean and lint-free.

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Jul 11, 2025

Stale

@leynos leynos closed this Jul 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant