Skip to content

Conversation

@modules-kpd-app
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: module: check symbol name offsets
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?series=901008

@modules-kpd-app
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 9852d85
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?series=901008
version: 1

Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?series=901008
error message:

Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
  cmdline: git am --3way
  stdout: 'Applying: module: check symbol name offsets
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	kernel/module/main.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging kernel/module/main.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in kernel/module/main.c
Patch failed at 0001 module: check symbol name offsets'
  stderr: 'error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"'

conflict:

diff --cc kernel/module/main.c
index 49b9bca9de12,c926960aed6d..000000000000
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@@ -1848,6 -1849,29 +1849,32 @@@ static int elf_validity_cache_copy(stru
  	info->strtab = (char *)info->hdr + info->sechdrs[info->index.str].sh_offset;
  
  	/*
++<<<<<<< HEAD
++=======
+ 	 * The string table must be NUL-terminated, as required
+ 	 * by the spec. This makes strcmp and pr_* calls that access
+ 	 * strings in the section safe.
+ 	 */
+ 	strhdr = &info->sechdrs[info->index.str];
+ 	if (strhdr->sh_size > 0 && info->strtab[strhdr->sh_size - 1] != '\0') {
+ 		pr_err("module %s: string table isn't null terminated\n",
+ 		       info->name ?: "(missing .modinfo section or name field)");
+ 		goto no_exec;
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	/* Symbol names must point into string table. */
+ 	shdr = &info->sechdrs[info->index.sym];
+ 	sym = (void *)info->hdr + shdr->sh_offset;
+ 	for (i = 1; i < shdr->sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Sym); i++) {
+ 		if (sym[i].st_name >= strhdr->sh_size) {
+ 			pr_err("module %s: illegal symbol name offset encountered\n",
+ 			       info->name ?: "(missing .modinfo section or name field)");
+ 			goto no_exec;
+ 		}
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	/*
++>>>>>>> module: check symbol name offsets
  	 * The ".gnu.linkonce.this_module" ELF section is special. It is
  	 * what modpost uses to refer to __this_module and let's use rely
  	 * on THIS_MODULE to point to &__this_module properly. The kernel's

@modules-kpd-app
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?series=901008 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@modules-kpd-app modules-kpd-app bot closed this Oct 22, 2024
@modules-kpd-app modules-kpd-app bot deleted the series/901008=>modules-next branch October 22, 2024 23:57
modules-kpd-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Function xen_pin_page calls xen_pte_lock, which in turn grab page
table lock (ptlock). When locking, xen_pte_lock expect mm->page_table_lock
to be held before grabbing ptlock, but this does not happen when pinning
is caused by xen_mm_pin_all.

This commit addresses lockdep warning below, which shows up when
suspending a Xen VM.

[ 3680.658422] Freezing user space processes
[ 3680.660156] Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[ 3680.660182] OOM killer disabled.
[ 3680.660192] Freezing remaining freezable tasks
[ 3680.661485] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[ 3680.685254]
[ 3680.685265] ==================================
[ 3680.685269] WARNING: Nested lock was not taken
[ 3680.685274] 6.12.0+ #16 Tainted: G        W
[ 3680.685279] ----------------------------------
[ 3680.685283] migration/0/19 is trying to lock:
[ 3680.685288] ffff88800bac33c0 (ptlock_ptr(ptdesc)#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685303]
[ 3680.685303] but this task is not holding:
[ 3680.685308] init_mm.page_table_lock
[ 3680.685311]
[ 3680.685311] stack backtrace:
[ 3680.685316] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 19 Comm: migration/0 Tainted: G        W          6.12.0+ #16
[ 3680.685324] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[ 3680.685328] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x120 <- __stop_cpus.constprop.0+0x8c/0xd0
[ 3680.685339] Call Trace:
[ 3680.685344]  <TASK>
[ 3680.685347]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[ 3680.685356]  __lock_acquire+0x917/0x2310
[ 3680.685364]  lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
[ 3680.685369]  ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685373]  _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock+0x2f/0x70
[ 3680.685381]  ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685386]  xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685390]  ? __pfx_xen_pin_page+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685394]  __xen_pgd_walk+0x233/0x2c0
[ 3680.685401]  ? stop_one_cpu+0x91/0x100
[ 3680.685405]  __xen_pgd_pin+0x5d/0x250
[ 3680.685410]  xen_mm_pin_all+0x70/0xa0
[ 3680.685415]  xen_pv_pre_suspend+0xf/0x280
[ 3680.685420]  xen_suspend+0x57/0x1a0
[ 3680.685428]  multi_cpu_stop+0x6b/0x120
[ 3680.685432]  ? update_cpumasks_hier+0x7c/0xa60
[ 3680.685439]  ? __pfx_multi_cpu_stop+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685443]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x8c/0x140
[ 3680.685448]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x20/0x1f0
[ 3680.685454]  ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685458]  smpboot_thread_fn+0xed/0x1f0
[ 3680.685462]  kthread+0xde/0x110
[ 3680.685467]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685471]  ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
[ 3680.685478]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685482]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 3680.685489]  </TASK>
[ 3680.685491]
[ 3680.685491] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3680.685497] 1 lock held by migration/0/19:
[ 3680.685500]  #0: ffffffff8284df38 (pgd_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xen_mm_pin_all+0x14/0xa0
[ 3680.685512]
[ 3680.685512] stack backtrace:
[ 3680.685518] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 19 Comm: migration/0 Tainted: G        W          6.12.0+ #16
[ 3680.685528] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[ 3680.685531] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x120 <- __stop_cpus.constprop.0+0x8c/0xd0
[ 3680.685538] Call Trace:
[ 3680.685541]  <TASK>
[ 3680.685544]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[ 3680.685549]  __lock_acquire+0x93c/0x2310
[ 3680.685554]  lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
[ 3680.685558]  ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685562]  _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock+0x2f/0x70
[ 3680.685568]  ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685572]  xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0
[ 3680.685578]  ? __pfx_xen_pin_page+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685582]  __xen_pgd_walk+0x233/0x2c0
[ 3680.685588]  ? stop_one_cpu+0x91/0x100
[ 3680.685592]  __xen_pgd_pin+0x5d/0x250
[ 3680.685596]  xen_mm_pin_all+0x70/0xa0
[ 3680.685600]  xen_pv_pre_suspend+0xf/0x280
[ 3680.685607]  xen_suspend+0x57/0x1a0
[ 3680.685611]  multi_cpu_stop+0x6b/0x120
[ 3680.685615]  ? update_cpumasks_hier+0x7c/0xa60
[ 3680.685620]  ? __pfx_multi_cpu_stop+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685625]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x8c/0x140
[ 3680.685629]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x20/0x1f0
[ 3680.685634]  ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685638]  smpboot_thread_fn+0xed/0x1f0
[ 3680.685642]  kthread+0xde/0x110
[ 3680.685645]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685649]  ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
[ 3680.685654]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 3680.685657]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 3680.685662]  </TASK>
[ 3680.685267] xen:grant_table: Grant tables using version 1 layout
[ 3680.685921] OOM killer enabled.
[ 3680.685934] Restarting tasks ... done.

Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta <maksym@exostellar.io>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Message-ID: <20241204103516.3309112-1-maksym@exostellar.io>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
modules-kpd-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants