Fix builds of SMEFT gg_tttt#632
Conversation
… in smeft (NB: THESE BREAK OTHER PROCESSES!) The "e+0" to "e + 0" fix breaks exponents elsehwre in eemumu/ggtt*...
… succeeds but the builds fails In make HRDCOD=0 (default) Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:19:2: error: #error This non-SM physics process only supports MGONGPU_HARDCODE_PARAM builds (madgraph5#439): please run "make HRDCOD=1" 19 | #error This non-SM physics process only supports MGONGPU_HARDCODE_PARAM builds (madgraph5#439): please run "make HRDCOD=1" | ^~~~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.cc:33:47: error: exponent has no digits 33 | mdl_WH = slha.get_block_entry( "decay", 25, 4.070000e - 03 ); | ^~~~~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:535:43: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 535 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:541:64: error: conversion from ‘fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 541 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:542:33: error: ‘mdl_WH’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘mdl_dWH’? 542 | const fptype_sv mdl_dWH = mdl_WH * ( -0.24161 * mdl_dGf + 0.96644 * mdl_dgw + 0.4832199999999999 * mdl_dkH - 0.11186509426655467 * mdl_dWW + ( 0.36410378449238195 * mdl_cHj3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.17608307708657747 * mdl_cHl3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.1636 * mdl_cHG * mdl_MT__exp__2 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 * ( -0.5 * mdl_gHgg2 * mdl_MH__exp__2 + mdl_gHgg1 * mdl_MT__exp__2 ) ) + ( mdl_cHW * ( -0.35937785117066967 * mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza + 0.006164 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth + 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHWB * ( -0.00454 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth + mdl_gHaa * ( -0.0030819999999999997 + 0.006163999999999999 * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHB * ( -0.006163999999999999 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth - 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * ( -1. + mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + mdl_dWHc + mdl_dWHb + mdl_dWHta ); | ^~~~~~ | mdl_dWH ... In make HRDCOD=1 Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:118:29: error: exponent has no digits 118 | constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:381:56: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO::constexpr_pow(2.0e+0, 2.5e-1)’ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:110:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 110 | assert( static_cast<double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:385:72: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 385 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:398:49: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<FP> mgOnGpu::conj(const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<FP>&) [with FP = double]’ 398 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_conjg__cbH = conj( mdl_cbH ); | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ ...
Fix conflicts: epochX/cudacpp/CODEGEN/PLUGIN/CUDACPP_SA_OUTPUT/model_handling.py (essentially, a better clang formatting fix was already in upstream/master)
…il both for HARDCOD=0 and =1, will try to merge susy2
|
I have retried the smeft_gg_tttt builds in PR #632 after merging in also the latest 'susy2' fixes from PR #625. There are still many failures for both HRDCOD=0 (#616) and HRDCOD=1 (#614). It's quite clear that smeft has separate issues than susy, and it is quite obvious that these should be separate PRs. I will focus on susy instead then... |
…is ok (also added src/constexpr_math.h), builds fail for both HRDCOD=0 amd =1 For HRDCOD=1 (madgraph5#616), this is a (non-exhautive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:121:31: error: exponent has no digits 121 | constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:384:58: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘mg5amcCpu::constexpr_pow(((long double)2.0e+0), ((long double)2.5e-1))’ ../../src/constexpr_math.h:55:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 55 | assert( static_cast<long double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:388:37: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 388 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const fptype*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:554:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 554 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:560:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 560 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(121): warning #2506-D: a user-provided literal suffix must begin with "_" Remark: The warnings can be suppressed with "-diag-suppress <warning-number>" ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(121): error: user-defined literal operator not found For HRDCOD=0 (madgraph5#614), this is a (non-exhautive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const fptype*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:554:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 554 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:560:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 560 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:561:35: error: ‘mdl_WH’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘mdl_dWH’? 561 | const fptype_sv mdl_dWH = mdl_WH * ( -0.24161 * mdl_dGf + 0.96644 * mdl_dgw + 0.4832199999999999 * mdl_dkH - 0.11186509426655467 * mdl_dWW + ( 0.36410378449238195 * mdl_cHj3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.17608307708657747 * mdl_cHl3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.1636 * mdl_cHG * mdl_MT__exp__2 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 * ( -0.5 * mdl_gHgg2 * mdl_MH__exp__2 + mdl_gHgg1 * mdl_MT__exp__2 ) ) + ( mdl_cHW * ( -0.35937785117066967 * mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza + 0.006164 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth + 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHWB * ( -0.00454 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth + mdl_gHaa * ( -0.0030819999999999997 + 0.006163999999999999 * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHB * ( -0.006163999999999999 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth - 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * ( -1. + mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + mdl_dWHc + mdl_dWHb + mdl_dWHta ); | ^~~~~~ | mdl_dWH ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(554): error: identifier "aS" is undefined ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(560): error: expression must have a constant value ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(560): note #2689-D: the value of variable "G" (550): here cannot be used as a constant ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(561): error: identifier "mdl_WH" is undefined
…but HRDCOD=0/1 builds still fail
|
I have also included the "susy" branch changes from PR #824. But smeft builds still fail, this requires slightly different types of fixes. |
…but HRDCOD=0/1 builds still fail -- For HRDCOD=0 (madgraph5#616), this is a (non-exhaustive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const double*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:583:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 583 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:589:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 589 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(583): error: identifier "aS" is undefined ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(589): error: expression must have a constant value ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(589): note #2689-D: the value of variable "G" (579): here cannot be used as a constant -- For HRDCOD=1 (madgraph5#614), this is a (non-exhaustive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:122:42: error: exponent has no digits 122 | __device__ constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:385:58: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘mg5amcCpu::constexpr_pow(((long double)2.0e+0), ((long double)2.5e-1))’ ../../src/constexpr_math.h:55:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 55 | assert( static_cast<long double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:106, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: /usr/include/assert.h:67:13: note: ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ declared here 67 | extern void __assert_fail (const char *__assertion, const char *__file, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:389:37: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 389 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:389:74: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 389 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(122): warning #2506-D: a user-provided literal suffix must begin with "_" Remark: The warnings can be suppressed with "-diag-suppress <warning-number>" ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(122): error: user-defined literal operator not found
…build: compute aS from G, fix and remove unnecessary calculation of G^3 Now 'make HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=f' and 'make HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d' fail only because ABS is missing
… builds: replace ABS by std::abs
…RDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d tests CUDACPP_RUNTEST_DUMPEVENTS=1 ./runTest.exe
…om HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d tests CUDACPP_RUNTEST_DUMPEVENTS=1 ./runTest.exe cp ../../test/ref/dump* ../../../CODEGEN/PLUGIN/CUDACPP_SA_OUTPUT/test/ref/
…etter handling of aS, G^2, G^3 for SMEFT madgraph5#616 Note: generated code does not change here, only how it is generated
…adgraph5#616) builds: replace ABS by std::abs
|
Hi @oliviermattelaer this one about SMEFT is also ready for review now, can you have a look please? Note, again this builds on top of the previous PR #824 for SUSY. So if you prefer just look at SUSY first. The new fixes here are related, but much simpler in a way, so maybe easiest if you approve the SUSY 824 first. (Then the review of this 632 becomes easier after merging 824). Again, I am still running larger scale tests here in #632 before merging. But the review can already start. Thanks! (Note: the CI tests are ok now, I fixed the small pending issues about G^2 and G^3, which were strangely different in SUSY and SMEFT) |
…ng, I will make them shorter
…ec and LHE are ok! 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt
… issues madgraph5#825 and madgraph5#826 are still open
…_h_bb and SM gg_bb for comparison, see madgraph5#828)
…(do not remove them completely yet?)
|
Good news, the 'tmad' tests (comparing fortran and cuda/cpp xsec and LHE) succeed for SMEFT gg_tttt. There are not the same issues as SUSY #825 or #826. I also tried to improve on the HEFT and define a different process, but I have a doubt #828. I am now rerunning large scale tests, then this is good to merge for me. |
STARTED AT Wed Mar 20 02:50:23 PM CET 2024 ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -mix -hrd -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttg -ggttgg -gqttq -ggttggg -makeclean ENDED(1) AT Wed Mar 20 06:23:49 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -flt -hrd -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -inlonly -makeclean ENDED(2) AT Wed Mar 20 06:51:12 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttg -gqttq -ggttgg -ggttggg -flt -bridge -makeclean ENDED(3) AT Wed Mar 20 07:01:20 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -rmbhst ENDED(4) AT Wed Mar 20 07:04:44 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -curhst ENDED(5) AT Wed Mar 20 07:08:09 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -common ENDED(6) AT Wed Mar 20 07:11:36 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -flt -hrd -makej -susyggtt -susyggt1t1 -smeftggtttt -heftggh -makeclean ENDED(7) AT Wed Mar 20 07:35:11 PM CET 2024 [Status=0]
(SM tests) STARTED AT Wed Mar 20 07:35:11 PM CET 2024 ENDED AT Thu Mar 21 12:12:59 AM CET 2024 (BSM tests) STARTED AT Thu Mar 21 12:12:59 AM CET 2024 ENDED AT Thu Mar 21 12:21:27 AM CET 2024 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt
|
All my tests are done, this is good to go for me. Can merge as soon as revieweed. |
|
I have updated this by merging in master after #824 susy was merged |
oliviermattelaer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will just need to made some change when upstream is ready with the required fix
… and SMEFT madgraph5#632) into heft
Thanks Olivier. We already merged this, now I just checked that I replied to all comments. All good for me. |
… and SMEFT madgraph5#632) into jtmk Fix minor conflicts: epochX/cudacpp/tput/throughputX.sh
This is a WIP MR including the process SMEFT gg_tttt relevant for @zeniheisser .
The builds fail both in HRDCOD=0 (#616) and HRDCOD=1 (#614)
cc: @zeniheisser @oliviermattelaer @roiser