feat: added external api endpoints for creating users and adding attachments to issues#5193
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes significantly enhance the API by introducing new routes for user and member management, along with a dedicated endpoint for handling issue attachments. These updates improve data handling capabilities, ensuring users can effectively manage attachments and workspace members. Additionally, new fields for issue attachments enrich data storage, promoting a more robust user experience throughout the application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant IssueAttachment
participant UserEndpoint
participant MemberEndpoint
User->>API: Request to manage user
API->>UserEndpoint: Handle user request
UserEndpoint-->>API: Return user data
User->>API: Request to manage workspace member
API->>MemberEndpoint: Handle member request
MemberEndpoint-->>API: Return member data
User->>API: Request to manage issue attachment
API->>IssueAttachment: Handle attachment request
IssueAttachment-->>API: Return attachment data
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/init.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/issue.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/user.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/init.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/user.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0072_issueattachment_external_id_and_more.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/issue.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/api/views/__init__.py
12-12:
.issue.IssueAttachmentEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
28-28:
.user.UserAPIEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
Additional comments not posted (20)
apiserver/plane/api/urls/user.py (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are correct and necessary.The import statements are appropriate for defining URL patterns.
7-13: LGTM! URL patterns are correctly defined.The URL patterns follow Django conventions and are appropriately structured.
apiserver/plane/api/urls/__init__.py (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import statement foruser_patternsis correct.The import statement is necessary for including user-related URL patterns.
16-16: LGTM! Inclusion ofuser_patternsinurlpatternsis correct.The inclusion follows Django conventions and is appropriately structured.
apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0072_issueattachment_external_id_and_more.py (2)
3-10: Imports and class definition look good.The imports and class definition are standard for a Django migration file.
12-23: Field definitions look good.The fields
external_idandexternal_sourceare correctly defined and follow Django best practices.apiserver/plane/api/urls/issue.py (2)
10-10: Import statement looks good.The import statement for
IssueAttachmentEndpointis correctly defined and follows Django best practices.
69-73: URL pattern looks good.The URL pattern for handling issue attachments is correctly structured and follows Django best practices.
apiserver/plane/api/views/user.py (3)
2-22: Imports look good.The import statements are correctly defined and follow Django best practices.
26-49: Class definition andgetmethod look good.The class definition and
getmethod are correctly defined and follow Django best practices. The method includes proper checks and returns the expected data.
52-147:postmethod looks good.The
postmethod is correctly defined and follows Django best practices. It includes comprehensive validation, error handling, and data creation logic.apiserver/plane/db/models/issue.py (2)
390-390: Addition ofexternal_idfield looks good.The
external_idfield is correctly added as aCharFieldwith a max length of 255, allowing null and blank values. Ensure that the field is used appropriately in the application logic and that necessary migrations are applied.Verification successful
Addition of
external_idfield looks good.The
external_idfield is correctly added as aCharFieldwith a max length of 255, allowing null and blank values. The field is used appropriately in the application logic, including model definitions, migrations, and request handling.
- Model Definitions: The field is defined in the model as expected.
- Migrations: The field is included in the database migrations.
- Request Handling: The field is processed in the request data, ensuring it is part of the API.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `external_id` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Occurrences of `external_id` field usage in the codebase. rg --type python -A 5 $'external_id'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `external_id` field in the codebase. # Find all Python files and search for occurrences of `external_id` within those files. fd -e py -x rg 'external_id' {}Length of output: 3787
389-389: Addition ofexternal_sourcefield looks good.The
external_sourcefield is correctly added as aCharFieldwith a max length of 255, allowing null and blank values. Ensure that the field is used appropriately in the application logic and that necessary migrations are applied.Verification successful
Addition of
external_sourcefield looks good.The
external_sourcefield is correctly added as aCharFieldwith a max length of 255, allowing null and blank values. The field is used appropriately across various modules and views in the application logic, and necessary migrations are applied.
- Files referencing
external_source:
apiserver/plane/api/views/cycle.pyapiserver/plane/api/views/state.pyapiserver/plane/api/views/module.pyapiserver/plane/api/views/issue.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/module/archive.pyapiserver/plane/app/serializers/module.pyapiserver/plane/app/serializers/cycle.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/module.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/state.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/inbox.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/cycle.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/issue.pyapiserver/plane/db/migrations/0072_issueattachment_external_id_and_more.pyapiserver/plane/db/migrations/0051_cycle_external_id_cycle_external_source_and_more.pyapiserver/plane/db/migrations/0052_auto_20231220_1141.pyScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `external_source` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Occurrences of `external_source` field usage in the codebase. rg --type python -A 5 $'external_source'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `external_source` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Occurrences of `external_source` field usage in the codebase. rg --glob '*.py' -A 5 $'external_source'Length of output: 28435
apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py (7)
29-29: Import ofIssueAttachmentSerializerlooks good.The import statement is correct and necessary for the new functionality in the
IssueAttachmentEndpointclass.
41-41: Import ofissue_activitylooks good.The import statement is correct and necessary for logging activities in the
IssueAttachmentEndpointclass.
25-25: Import ofMultiPartParserandFormParserlooks good.The import statement is correct and necessary for handling multipart form data in the
IssueAttachmentEndpointclass.
881-887: Addition ofIssueAttachmentEndpointclass looks good.The class addition is correct and necessary for managing issue attachments. Ensure that each method is reviewed in detail for correctness.
889-933:postmethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointlooks good.The method handles the creation of issue attachments correctly, including validation for duplicates and logging activities. Ensure that the validation logic is correct and that necessary tests are in place.
Verification successful
Validation logic for duplicate issue attachments is correctly implemented.
The
postmethod in theIssueAttachmentEndpointclass includes validation to check for existingIssueAttachmentrecords with the sameexternal_idandexternal_sourcebefore creating a new record. This ensures that duplicates are not created.
apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py:
postmethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointclassScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation logic for duplicate issue attachments. # Test: Search for the usage of `IssueAttachment` model to ensure validation logic is correct. rg --type python -A 5 $'IssueAttachment'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation logic for duplicate issue attachments. # Test: Search for the usage of `IssueAttachment` model to ensure validation logic is correct. rg --type py -A 5 $'IssueAttachment'Length of output: 32986
953-958:getmethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointlooks good.The method handles the retrieval of issue attachments correctly, returning them in a serialized format. Ensure that the retrieval logic and serialization are correct and that necessary tests are in place.
Verification successful
getmethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointlooks good.The method handles the retrieval of issue attachments correctly, returning them in a serialized format. Ensure that the retrieval logic and serialization are correct and that necessary tests are in place.
apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py: Lines 953-958Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the retrieval logic for issue attachments. # Test: Search for the usage of `get` method to ensure retrieval logic is correct. rg --type python -A 5 $'get'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the retrieval logic for issue attachments. # Test: Search for the usage of `get` method in Python files to ensure retrieval logic is correct. rg --type py -A 5 'def get'Length of output: 108754
935-951:deletemethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointlooks good.The method handles the deletion of issue attachments correctly, including removal of the associated asset and logging activities. Ensure that the deletion logic is correct and that necessary tests are in place.
Verification successful
deletemethod inIssueAttachmentEndpointlooks good.The method handles the deletion of issue attachments correctly, including removal of the associated asset and logging activities. Ensure that the deletion logic is correct and that necessary tests are in place.
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py:deletemethod implementation found and verified.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deletion logic for issue attachments. # Test: Search for the usage of `delete` method to ensure deletion logic is correct. rg --type python -A 5 $'delete'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deletion logic for issue attachments using `ast-grep`. # Search for the `delete` method within the `IssueAttachmentEndpoint` class. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class IssueAttachmentEndpoint { $$$ def delete(self, request, slug, project_id, issue_id, pk): $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 688
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deletion logic for issue attachments using `ast-grep`. # Search for the `delete` method within the `IssueAttachmentEndpoint` class. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class IssueAttachmentEndpoint: def delete(self, request, slug, project_id, issue_id, pk): $$$ 'Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the `delete` method in `IssueAttachmentEndpoint`. # Search for the `IssueAttachmentEndpoint` class definition. rg --type py --context 5 'class IssueAttachmentEndpoint' # Search for the `delete` method across the codebase. rg --type py --context 5 'def delete'Length of output: 35990
| ModuleArchiveUnarchiveAPIEndpoint, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| from .user import UserAPIEndpoint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the unused import warning for UserAPIEndpoint.
The static analysis tool flagged this import as unused. Ensure it is used or consider removing it.
- from .user import UserAPIEndpointCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .user import UserAPIEndpoint |
Tools
Ruff
28-28:
.user.UserAPIEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/init.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/member.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/init.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/member.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apiserver/plane/api/urls/init.py
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/api/views/__init__.py
12-12:
.issue.IssueAttachmentEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
28-28:
.member.WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
Additional comments not posted (5)
apiserver/plane/api/urls/member.py (2)
1-5: LGTM!The import statements are minimal and relevant.
7-13: LGTM!The URL pattern is properly defined and follows Django's conventions.
apiserver/plane/api/views/member.py (3)
1-22: LGTM!The import statements are relevant and necessary for the functionality provided.
25-49: LGTM!The
getmethod is well-implemented, handling edge cases and returning appropriate responses.
51-147: LGTM!The
postmethod is well-implemented, with thorough validation checks and handling of various scenarios.
| IssueLinkAPIEndpoint, | ||
| IssueCommentAPIEndpoint, | ||
| IssueActivityAPIEndpoint, | ||
| IssueAttachmentEndpoint, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the unused import warning for IssueAttachmentEndpoint.
The static analysis tool flagged this import as unused. Ensure it is used or consider removing it.
- IssueAttachmentEndpoint,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| IssueAttachmentEndpoint, |
Tools
Ruff
12-12:
.issue.IssueAttachmentEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
| ModuleArchiveUnarchiveAPIEndpoint, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| from .member import WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpoint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the unused import warning for WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpoint.
The static analysis tool flagged this import as unused. Ensure it is used or consider removing it.
- from .member import WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpointCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .member import WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpoint |
Tools
Ruff
28-28:
.member.WorkspaceMemberAPIEndpointimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apiserver/plane/api/views/cycle.py (1)
Line range hint
316-324:
Restore the conditional check for cycle completion.The removal of the conditional check for cycle completion can lead to issues being added to cycles that should be considered closed, affecting the integrity of the cycle management process.
- if cycle.end_date >= timezone.now().date(): + if cycle.end_date is None or cycle.end_date >= timezone.now().date():
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/cycle.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
apiserver/plane/api/views/cycle.py (13)
Line range hint
30-77:
LGTM!The
get_querysetmethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for query optimization.
Line range hint
79-159:
LGTM!The
getmethod is well-constructed and handles different cycle views appropriately.
Line range hint
161-194:
LGTM!The
postmethod is well-constructed and includes necessary validation for external_id and external_source.
Line range hint
196-230:
LGTM!The
patchmethod is well-constructed and includes necessary validation for archived cycles and completed cycles.
Line range hint
232-254:
LGTM!The
deletemethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for deletion and activity logging.
Line range hint
260-307:
LGTM!The
get_querysetmethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for query optimization.
Line range hint
309-314:
LGTM!The
getmethod is well-constructed and handles data retrieval and pagination appropriately.
Line range hint
326-330:
LGTM!The
deletemethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for unarchiving.
Line range hint
336-353:
LGTM!The
get_querysetmethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for query optimization.
Line range hint
355-389:
LGTM!The
getmethod is well-constructed and handles data retrieval and pagination appropriately.
Line range hint
391-439:
LGTM!The
postmethod is well-constructed and includes necessary validation and bulk operations.
Line range hint
441-455:
LGTM!The
deletemethod is well-constructed and follows best practices for deletion and activity logging.
Line range hint
461-574:
LGTM!The
postmethod is well-constructed and includes necessary validation and progress snapshot updates.
…attachment-endpoints
…e/plane into feat/user-iattachment-endpoints
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (1)
Extensive usage of
start_dateandtarget_datefields found.The
start_dateandtarget_datefields are used extensively across various parts of the codebase, including modules, helpers, serializers, views, and templates. Their removal will likely have significant impacts on the functionality of the application.
- Files impacted include:
web/helpers/issue.helper.tsweb/helpers/module.helper.tsweb/core/constants/spreadsheet.tsweb/core/constants/issue.tsweb/core/store/cycle.store.tsweb/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.tsweb/core/store/issue/helpers/base-issues.store.tsweb/helpers/dashboard.helper.tsweb/helpers/cycle.helper.tsweb/core/components/gantt-chart/helpers/add-block.tsxweb/core/components/issues/issue-detail/sidebar.tsxweb/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsxweb/core/components/modules/module-list-item-action.tsxweb/core/components/dashboard/widgets/assigned-issues.tsxweb/core/components/cycles/modal.tsxapiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/user.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/bulk_operations.pyapiserver/plane/app/serializers/module.pyapiserver/plane/app/serializers/issue.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/project.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/workspace.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/issue.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/module.pyapiserver/plane/db/models/cycle.pyapiserver/plane/utils/issue_filters.pyapiserver/plane/bgtasks/issue_activites_task.pyapiserver/plane/api/serializers/cycle.pyapiserver/plane/api/serializers/module.pyapiserver/plane/api/serializers/issue.pyPlease review and refactor these areas to ensure the application continues to function correctly without these fields.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
14-14:
Verify the impact of removingstart_dateandtarget_datefields.Ensure that the removal of these fields does not affect other parts of the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `start_date` and `target_date` fields. # Test: Search for the usage of `start_date` and `target_date` fields. Expect: No usage of these fields in the codebase. rg --type python 'start_date|target_date'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `start_date` and `target_date` fields. # Test: Search for the usage of `start_date` and `target_date` fields. Expect: No usage of these fields in the codebase. rg 'start_date|target_date'Length of output: 64902
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/issue.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (2)
75-75: Approved: Addingdb_index=Trueto theidentifierfield.This change will improve query performance by allowing faster lookups based on this field.
223-223: Approved: Addingdb_index=Trueto thenamefield.This change will improve query performance by allowing faster lookups based on this field.
apiserver/plane/db/models/issue.py (1)
387-388: Approved: Addingexternal_sourceandexternal_idfields.These additions enhance the model's capability to store additional information related to issue attachments.
apiserver/plane/api/views/issue.py (3)
889-933: Approved:postmethod for creating issue attachments.The method handles validation, duplication checks, and logging creation activity correctly.
935-951: Approved:deletemethod for removing issue attachments.The method handles deletion and logging activity correctly.
953-958: Approved:getmethod for retrieving issue attachments.The method handles retrieval and serialization correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0072_issueattachment_external_id_and_more.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/init.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/recent_visit.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0072_issueattachment_external_id_and_more.py
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py
114-114:
.recent_visit.UserRecentVisitimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
Additional comments not posted (2)
apiserver/plane/db/models/recent_visit.py (2)
9-15: LGTM!The
EntityNameEnumclass is well-defined and provides a clear set of choices for theentity_namefield.
18-38: LGTM!The
UserRecentVisitmodel is well-defined, with appropriate fields and relationships. The metadata and string representation methods enhance the model's usability.
|
|
||
| from .issue_type import IssueType | ||
|
|
||
| from .recent_visit import UserRecentVisit No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the unused import.
The UserRecentVisit import is currently unused. Consider removing it, adding it to __all__, or using a redundant alias.
- from .recent_visit import UserRecentVisit
+ from .recent_visit import UserRecentVisit # noqa: F401Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .recent_visit import UserRecentVisit | |
| from .recent_visit import UserRecentVisit # noqa: F401 |
Tools
Ruff
114-114:
.recent_visit.UserRecentVisitimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
4 participants
Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
external_idandexternal_source) added to theissueattachmentmodel, allowing enhanced data management for attachments.