Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-2320] fix: Redirect to issues page post issue deletion deletion#5437

Merged
SatishGandham merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-redirection-post-issue-deletion
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2320] fix: Redirect to issues page post issue deletion deletion#5437
SatishGandham merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-redirection-post-issue-deletion

Conversation

@rahulramesha
Copy link
Contributor

@rahulramesha rahulramesha commented Aug 27, 2024

This PR adds a redirection from issue detail page post issue deletion.

Screen.Recording.2024-08-27.at.4.24.25.PM.mov

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the logic for deleting issues, ensuring both archived and non-archived issues are handled correctly.
    • Simplified the redirection process after an issue is deleted for a smoother user experience.

@rahulramesha rahulramesha added 🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend labels Aug 27, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the IssueDetailQuickActions component involve refactoring the handleDeleteIssue function to streamline the deletion logic for both archived and non-archived issues. The new implementation reduces code duplication by utilizing a single variable to determine the appropriate deletion function and another for the redirection path after deletion.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/... Refactored handleDeleteIssue to consolidate logic for deleting issues, reducing code duplication.

Poem

🐰 In the code, a change so bright,
A quick action brought to light.
With logic neat and paths aligned,
We hop along, no bugs to find!
A cleaner dance, a joyful cheer,
For every issue, we hold dear! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 224c8bc and 15028c2.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-detail-quick-actions.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-detail-quick-actions.tsx (2)

81-81: Refactor: Consolidate deletion logic

The use of the deleteIssue variable to conditionally assign either removeArchivedIssue or removeIssue based on whether the issue is archived is a good refactor. It reduces code duplication and improves readability.

The code changes are approved.


82-84: Refactor: Simplify redirection logic

The use of the redirectionPath variable to determine the redirection path after deletion is a good refactor. It simplifies the routing logic and makes the code more maintainable.

The code changes are approved.

Comment on lines +86 to +93
return deleteIssue(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId).then(() => {
router.push(redirectionPath);
captureIssueEvent({
eventName: ISSUE_DELETED,
payload: { id: issueId, state: "SUCCESS", element: "Issue detail page" },
path: pathname,
});
} else {
return removeIssue(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId);
}
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling

The refactored code correctly handles errors by displaying a toast message and capturing the issue event. However, consider logging the error for debugging purposes.

 try {
   const deleteIssue = issue?.archived_at ? removeArchivedIssue : removeIssue;
   const redirectionPath = issue?.archived_at
     ? `/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/archives/issues`
     : `/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues`;

   return deleteIssue(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId).then(() => {
     router.push(redirectionPath);
     captureIssueEvent({
       eventName: ISSUE_DELETED,
       payload: { id: issueId, state: "SUCCESS", element: "Issue detail page" },
       path: pathname,
     });
   });
 } catch (error) {
+  console.error("Error deleting issue:", error);
   setToast({
     title: "Error!",
     type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
     message: "Issue delete failed",
   });
   captureIssueEvent({
     eventName: ISSUE_DELETED,
     payload: { id: issueId, state: "FAILED", element: "Issue detail page" },
     path: pathname,
   });
 }

Consider logging the error for debugging purposes.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@SatishGandham SatishGandham merged commit e7a41b3 into preview Aug 27, 2024
@SatishGandham SatishGandham deleted the fix-redirection-post-issue-deletion branch August 27, 2024 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants