Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-2462] [WEB-2461] fix: project intake filters#5645

Merged
SatishGandham merged 3 commits intopreviewfrom
fix-intake-filters
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2462] [WEB-2461] fix: project intake filters#5645
SatishGandham merged 3 commits intopreviewfrom
fix-intake-filters

Conversation

@anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Sep 18, 2024

Changes:

This PR includes following changes:

  • Intake filters order by labels updated.
  • Intake filter section icon and spacing improvement.

Reference:

[WEB-2462] | [WEB-2461]

Media:

Before After
before after
before after

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced responsive design for buttons in the inbox filter, adapting to different screen sizes.
    • Simplified rendering logic for large and small buttons based on window width.
  • Improvements

    • Updated sorting option labels for clarity: "Date created" to "Created at" and "Date updated" to "Updated at."
    • Enhanced icon sizing consistency across components.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request enhance the responsiveness of the FiltersRoot and InboxIssueOrderByDropdown components by implementing a new useSize hook to conditionally render buttons based on the window size. Additionally, the sorting option labels in the INBOX_ISSUE_ORDER_BY_OPTIONS array have been updated for clarity. These modifications collectively improve the user interface's adaptability to different screen sizes and enhance label clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx Introduced responsive design in FiltersRoot component with conditional rendering of buttons based on window size. Adjusted class names for styling consistency.
web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx Added useSize hook for responsive button rendering in InboxIssueOrderByDropdown. Simplified button rendering logic and updated icon class names for consistency.
web/core/constants/inbox.tsx Updated sorting option labels for clarity: "Date created" to "Created at" and "Date updated" to "Updated at."

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham
  • rahulramesha

🐇 In the garden, buttons grow,
Responsive changes steal the show.
Labels clear, a joyful sight,
Adapting well, both day and night.
With every click, the interface sings,
A hop of joy, oh, what fun it brings! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5334b0 and ac6a07b.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 11:47
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx (1)

41-41: Conditional button rendering looks good.

The changes to the custom button rendering logic to conditionally render either the large button or the small button based on the window size align with the PR objectives to enhance responsiveness. The implementation is correct and improves the component's adaptability to different screen sizes.

Regarding the static analysis hint about removing the Fragment, while it's true that the Fragment is not strictly necessary in this case, it does not cause any harm or performance issues. It's a matter of personal preference and coding style. Feel free to remove it if you prefer, but it's not a critical issue.

Tools
Biome

[error] 41-41: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aec4162 and c5334b0.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx (3 hunks)
  • web/core/constants/inbox.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • web/core/constants/inbox.tsx
Additional context used
Biome
web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx

[error] 26-26: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx

[error] 41-41: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

Additional comments not posted (6)
web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/root.tsx (3)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement for the useSize hook is correctly added.


10-18: LGTM!

The smallButton and largeButton constants are correctly defined to represent the button variations for different window sizes. The class names and styles used are consistent with the project's styling conventions.


20-21: LGTM!

The useSize hook is correctly used to determine the current window size and store it in the windowSize variable. This is necessary for implementing the responsive design feature.

web/core/components/inbox/inbox-filter/sorting/order-by.tsx (3)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for the useSize hook is correctly added.


17-26: Great job simplifying the button rendering logic!

The changes made to the button rendering logic based on the window size enhance code readability and maintainability. The usage of the useSize hook and the simplified conditional expression is a cleaner approach compared to the previous structure.

Also, the updates to the class names for the icons ensure consistency in icon sizing across the component.


28-36: Icon class name updates look good.

The class name updates for the icons in the large button from h-3 to size-3 maintain consistency in icon sizing across the component.

<div className="relative flex items-center gap-2">
<div>
<FiltersDropdown
menuButton={<>{windowSize[0] > 1280 ? largeButton : smallButton}</>}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conditional button rendering looks good, but consider removing the unnecessary Fragment.

The usage of the ternary expression to conditionally render the appropriate button based on window size is correct and aligns with the responsive design feature. The threshold of 1280 pixels seems reasonable for determining when to switch between the large and small button variations.

However, as suggested by the static analysis hint, the Fragment (<>) wrapping the buttons may be unnecessary. Removing the Fragment would not affect the functionality or rendering of the buttons.

To remove the unnecessary Fragment, apply the following change:

- menuButton={<>{windowSize[0] > 1280 ? largeButton : smallButton}</>}
+ menuButton={windowSize[0] > 1280 ? largeButton : smallButton}
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
menuButton={<>{windowSize[0] > 1280 ? largeButton : smallButton}</>}
menuButton={windowSize[0] > 1280 ? largeButton : smallButton}
Tools
Biome

[error] 26-26: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants