[WEB-2545] fix: peek overview loading state#5698
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve refactoring the way issue fetching states are determined across various components in the application. The previous direct property accesses for fetching states have been replaced with function calls that accept issue IDs as arguments. This transition aims to enhance the granularity and flexibility of loading state management, ensuring that the fetching status is dynamically evaluated based on specific issue IDs. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (1)
43-43: Simplify the issueLoader assignmentThe change correctly implements the new
getIsFetchingIssueDetailsfunction. However, we can simplify this line to make it more concise and address the static analysis hint.Let's simplify the assignment:
- const issueLoader = !issue || getIsFetchingIssueDetails(issue?.id) ? true : false; + const issueLoader = !issue || getIsFetchingIssueDetails(issue?.id);This change removes the unnecessary ternary operator while maintaining the same logic.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 43-43: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (1)
44-44: Effective implementation of granular loading stateThe updated
issueLoaderassignment correctly implements the new approach of checking the loading state for a specific issue. This change enhances the accuracy of the loading state representation.However, we can further optimize this line:
Consider simplifying the boolean expression:
- const issueLoader = !issue || getIsFetchingIssueDetails(issue?.id) ? true : false; + const issueLoader = !issue || getIsFetchingIssueDetails(issue?.id);This change removes the unnecessary ternary operator, making the code more concise without altering its functionality.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 44-44: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-273: Summary and Next StepsThe changes in this file improve code quality and partially address the PR objectives. The renaming of
isLocalDBIssueDescriptiontogetIsLocalDBIssueDescriptionand the introduction of a new constant improve clarity and potentially performance.However, to fully address the PR objectives of modifying loading states for the peek overview feature, additional changes might be needed. Consider the following next steps:
- Review other files in the
peek-overviewdirectory for any remaining boolean loading states that need to be updated.- Ensure that the
getIsLocalDBIssueDescriptionfunction is implemented correctly to return issue-specific loading states.- Update any components that consume this loading state to handle the new issue-specific format.
- Add unit tests to verify the correct behavior of the new loading state implementation.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 69-69: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (1)
347-347: Enhanced loading state management for individual issuesThe replacement of
isFetchingIssueDetailswithgetIsFetchingIssueDetails(peekIssue.issueId)is a positive change. It allows for more precise control over the loading state for each individual issue, which aligns with the PR objectives and improves the component's flexibility.Consider memoizing the result of
getIsFetchingIssueDetails(peekIssue.issueId)ifpeekIssue.issueIdis stable between renders. This can be done using theuseMemohook:const isFetchingCurrentIssueDetails = useMemo( () => getIsFetchingIssueDetails(peekIssue.issueId), [getIsFetchingIssueDetails, peekIssue.issueId] );Then use
isFetchingCurrentIssueDetailsin theIssueViewprops. This optimization can help prevent unnecessary re-computations if the component re-renders frequently.web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts (1)
55-56: Adjust observables for collection data typesIf you change
fetchingIssueDetailsandlocalDBIssueDescriptionto collections (e.g.,Set<string>), update their observability to useobservable.setorobservable.mapinstead ofobservable.refto ensure MobX tracks changes within the collections properly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/view.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Biome
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx
[error] 43-43: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx
[error] 44-44: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (9)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (1)
22-22: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The change from
isFetchingIssueDetailstogetIsFetchingIssueDetailsaligns with the PR objectives, allowing for more granular loading state management per issue. This is a good improvement.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of this hook across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Please Update the Search Commands with Correct File Types
The previous shell script failed because
rgdoes not recognizetypescriptas a valid file type. Please update the file type flags totsandtsxas shown below:
Please Update the Search Commands Using Glob Patterns
The previous shell scripts failed because
rgdid not recognize thetsandtsxfile types. Please update the file search method to use glob patterns instead:
Verification Successful: All References Updated
All instances of
isFetchingIssueDetailshave been successfully replaced withgetIsFetchingIssueDetails. The refactor is consistent across the codebase, and no leftover references to the old identifier were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails and new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails echo "Checking for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'isFetchingIssueDetails' echo "\nChecking new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'getIsFetchingIssueDetails'Length of output: 426
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails and new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails echo "Checking for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'isFetchingIssueDetails' echo "\nChecking new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'getIsFetchingIssueDetails'Length of output: 396
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails and new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails echo "Checking for any remaining usage of isFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'isFetchingIssueDetails' echo "\nChecking new usage of getIsFetchingIssueDetails:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'getIsFetchingIssueDetails'Length of output: 1536
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (2)
30-30: Improved granularity in loading state managementThe change from
isFetchingIssueDetailstogetIsFetchingIssueDetailsaligns well with the PR objective. This modification allows for more precise control over loading states, enabling them to be specific to individual issues rather than a global state.
Line range hint
1-102: Summary: Effective implementation of granular loading statesThe changes in this file successfully implement the PR objective of using issue-specific loading states instead of a global boolean. The modifications are minimal yet impactful, enhancing the accuracy of loading state representation without introducing apparent regressions.
To ensure the changes are comprehensive, please run the following verification:
This script will help ensure that all instances of the old loading state check have been updated and that the new function is properly implemented.
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/view.tsx (2)
63-63: Improved method naming conventionThe change from
isLocalDBIssueDescriptiontogetIsLocalDBIssueDescriptionis a good improvement. This new name better reflects that it's a getter function, making the code more self-explanatory and adhering to common naming conventions for accessor methods.
72-73: Improved performance and alignment with PR objectivesThis change is beneficial for several reasons:
- It moves the method call outside of the JSX, potentially improving performance by preventing unnecessary re-renders.
- The constant name matches the previous property name, maintaining consistency in usage throughout the component.
- This change allows for issue-specific loading state, which aligns with the PR objectives of using issueIds instead of a general boolean state.
However, it's not clear if this change fully addresses the PR objectives of modifying loading states for the peek overview feature. Additional changes might be needed in other parts of the codebase to fully implement this feature.
To ensure this change fully addresses the PR objectives, let's check for any other uses of loading states in this file or related components:
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (2)
38-38: Improved granularity in loading state managementThe change from
isFetchingIssueDetailstogetIsFetchingIssueDetailsaligns well with the PR objectives. This modification allows for more precise control over the loading state, potentially on a per-issue basis, which can lead to a more accurate representation of the application's state.
Line range hint
1-354: Summary: Improved loading state management aligns with PR objectivesThe changes implemented in this file successfully address the PR objectives by modifying the loading state management from a boolean value to a function that can handle individual issue IDs. This enhancement allows for more precise control over loading states, potentially improving the user experience by providing more accurate feedback on the status of each issue.
The modifications are well-contained and don't introduce any apparent negative side effects or unintended consequences to the existing functionality. The changes are consistent throughout the component, from the hook usage to the prop passing.
Overall, these changes represent a positive improvement to the
IssuePeekOverviewcomponent, enhancing its flexibility and accuracy in handling loading states.web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts (2)
66-70: Verify handling of multiple concurrent issue fetchesThe method
getIsFetchingIssueDetailscompares the providedissueIdwiththis.fetchingIssueDetails. If you adjustfetchingIssueDetailsto support multipleissueIds as suggested, ensure this method is updated to check for the presence of theissueIdwithin the collection.
72-76: Verify handling of multiple local DB issue descriptionsSimilarly,
getIsLocalDBIssueDescriptionshould be updated to handle a collection ofissueIds iflocalDBIssueDescriptionis modified to support multiple entries. Ensure it correctly determines if a givenissueIdis part of the collection.
| fetchingIssueDetails: string | undefined = undefined; | ||
| localDBIssueDescription: string | undefined = undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential issue with concurrent fetching of issue details
The properties fetchingIssueDetails and localDBIssueDescription are currently defined to store a single issueId (string | undefined). If multiple issues are fetched concurrently, this implementation may not accurately reflect the loading state for each issue, leading to race conditions or incorrect UI states.
Consider modifying these properties to hold a collection of issueIds, such as a Set<string>, to properly track the loading state of multiple issues concurrently.
| this.fetchingIssueDetails = issueId; | ||
|
|
||
| if (issue) { | ||
| this.addIssueToStore(issue); | ||
| this.isLocalDBIssueDescription = true; | ||
| this.localDBIssueDescription = issueId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure accurate tracking of fetching states for multiple issues
When initiating the fetch operation, you set this.fetchingIssueDetails = issueId;. With multiple concurrent fetches, you should add the issueId to the collection rather than assigning it directly. Similarly, when an issue is fetched from the local DB, add the issueId to localDBIssueDescription to accurately reflect the loading states.
|
|
||
| const issuePayload = this.addIssueToStore(issue); | ||
| this.isLocalDBIssueDescription = false; | ||
| this.localDBIssueDescription = undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Properly clear the local DB issue description state
After processing the issue, you set this.localDBIssueDescription = undefined;. If multiple issues are being processed, this might prematurely reset the state. Ensure you remove only the relevant issueId from the collection to maintain accurate state.
|
|
||
| this.rootIssueDetailStore.rootIssueStore.issues.addIssue([issuePayload]); | ||
| this.isFetchingIssueDetails = false; | ||
| this.fetchingIssueDetails = undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Properly clear the fetching issue details state
At the end of addIssueToStore, you set this.fetchingIssueDetails = undefined;. If multiple fetch operations are in progress, this could inadvertently reset the fetching state for other issues. Consider removing only the completed issueId from the collection.
2 participants
This PR changes the loading states for peek overview from boolean to issueIds to ensure that it only applies to the particular issue.
issue.modal.fix.mov
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor