Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-2579] fix: frequent loader on issue detail / archived issue detail page.#5724

Merged
pushya22 merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix/issue-detail-loader
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2579] fix: frequent loader on issue detail / archived issue detail page.#5724
pushya22 merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix/issue-detail-loader

Conversation

@prateekshourya29
Copy link
Member

@prateekshourya29 prateekshourya29 commented Sep 30, 2024

Reverted a recent refactor causing the loader to appear too frequently on the issue and archived issue detail pages. This also resolves interference with image upload functionality in the issue detail page.

Issue link: WEB-2579

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved loading state management for archived and current issue details.
    • Simplified logic for displaying loading indicators and issue details.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved inconsistencies in loading state handling for issue details.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the ArchivedIssueDetailsPage and IssueDetailsPage components by removing the getIsFetchingIssueDetails method from the issue object. The loading state is now determined solely by the isLoading property from the useSWR hook, simplifying the logic for fetching issue details. This results in a more straightforward approach to managing loading states while maintaining the overall structure of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx Removed getIsFetchingIssueDetails method; loading state now relies on isLoading from useSWR.
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx Removed getIsFetchingIssueDetails method; loading state now relies on isLoading from useSWR.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham

🐇 In the code, we hop with glee,
Fetching issues, oh so free!
No more checks that make us wait,
Just isLoading, isn't that great?
Simplified paths, we bound and play,
Celebrating changes, hip-hip-hooray! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (1)

Line range hint 27-34: LGTM: Improved loading state management

The introduction of the isLoading state from the useSWR hook provides a more reliable way to determine the loading state. This change directly addresses the PR objective of fixing the frequent loader issue.

Consider destructuring isLoading along with other properties from useSWR for consistency:

const { isLoading, data } = useSWR(
  // ... (rest of the code remains the same)
);

This change would make the code more consistent and easier to read, especially if you need to use other properties from the useSWR hook in the future.

web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (3)

Line range hint 35-41: Improved loading state management with useSWR

The inclusion of isLoading from the useSWR hook is a good improvement. It directly ties the loading state to the data fetching process, which should help address the frequent loader issue mentioned in the PR objectives.

Consider destructuring data as well from the useSWR hook for consistency and potential future use:

-const { isLoading, error } = useSWR(
+const { data, isLoading, error } = useSWR(

This change would make it clearer what data is being fetched and could be useful if you need to use the fetched data directly in the future.


44-44: Simplified loading state determination

The new issueLoader assignment correctly uses the isLoading state from useSWR, which should provide a more accurate representation of when to show the loader. This change aligns well with the PR objective of fixing the frequent loader issue.

However, the current implementation can be simplified. As suggested by the static analysis tool, you can remove the boolean literals and directly assign the result:

-const issueLoader = !issue || isLoading ? true : false;
+const issueLoader = !issue || isLoading;

This simplification makes the code more concise and easier to read while maintaining the same functionality.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 44-44: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)


Image Upload Functionality Not Addressed

The changes in this PR effectively resolve the frequent loader issue on the issue detail page by improving the loading state management. However, there are no modifications related to the image upload functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. The image upload interference issue remains unresolved and should be addressed in subsequent updates.

  • Files to review for image upload functionality:
    • web/core/components/core/image-picker-popover.tsx
    • web/core/components/core/modals/index.ts
    • web/core/components/core/modals/workspace-image-upload-modal.tsx
    • web/core/components/core/modals/user-image-upload-modal.tsx
    • packages/editor/src/core/plugins/drag-handle.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/plugins/image/index.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/plugins/image/utils/placeholder.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/plugins/image/image-upload-handler.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/extensions/extensions.tsx
    • packages/editor/src/core/extensions/custom-image/components/index.ts
    • packages/editor/src/core/extensions/custom-image/components/image-uploader.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-102: Summary of changes and PR objectives

The changes in this file effectively address the PR objective of fixing the frequent loader issue on the issue detail page. The modifications to the loading state management, including the removal of getIsFetchingIssueDetails and the use of isLoading from useSWR, should significantly reduce unnecessary loader appearances.

However, this file doesn't contain any changes specifically related to fixing the image upload functionality interference mentioned in the PR objectives. This issue might be addressed in other files not included in this review.

To ensure that the image upload functionality is working correctly, please run the following verification script:

This script will help identify any recent changes or relevant files related to the image upload functionality, which might need to be reviewed to ensure the interference issue has been addressed.



🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent changes related to image upload functionality

# Search for files with recent changes related to image upload
echo "Files with recent changes related to image upload:"
git log -n 1 --name-only --grep="image upload" --pretty=format:""

# Search for image upload related functions or components
echo "Files containing image upload related code:"
rg -l "image.*upload" --type typescript --type tsx

Length of output: 361


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent changes related to image upload functionality

# Search for files with recent changes related to image upload
echo "Files with recent changes related to image upload:"
git log -n 1 --name-only --grep="image upload" --pretty=format:""

# Search for image upload related functions or components
echo "Files containing image upload related code:"
rg -l "image.*upload" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 346


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent changes related to image upload functionality

# Search for files with recent changes related to image upload
echo "Files with recent changes related to image upload:"
git log -n 1 --name-only --grep="image upload" --pretty=format:""

# Search for image upload related functions or components
echo "Files containing image upload related code:"
rg -l "image.*upload" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

Length of output: 997

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 944f341 and 278bad2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx

[error] 43-43: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx

[error] 44-44: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/archives/issues/(detail)/[archivedIssueId]/page.tsx (2)

22-22: LGTM: Simplified issue detail hook usage

The removal of getIsFetchingIssueDetails from the destructured issue object aligns with the PR objective of fixing the frequent loader issue. This change simplifies the component and doesn't appear to introduce any new issues or break existing functionality.


Line range hint 1-78: Overall assessment: Changes effectively address the PR objectives

The modifications made to this file successfully address the issue of frequent loader appearances on the archived issue detail page. Key improvements include:

  1. Simplified issue detail hook usage
  2. Improved loading state management using SWR's isLoading state
  3. Streamlined issueLoader variable

These changes make the code more maintainable and should resolve the reported issues without introducing new problems. The overall structure and functionality of the component remain intact, with the primary difference being a more accurate and efficient loading state determination.

web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/issues/(detail)/[issueId]/page.tsx (1)

30-30: Simplified issue state management

The removal of getIsFetchingIssueDetails from the destructured issue object aligns with the PR objective of fixing the frequent loader issue. This change simplifies the state management related to loading issues, which should help reduce unnecessary loader appearances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants