fix: bucket policy script to handle error conditions#5887
fix: bucket policy script to handle error conditions#5887sriramveeraghanta merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apiserver/plane/db/management/commands/update_bucket.py (2)
Line range hint
175-185: Simplify exception handling in permission checkThe
tryblock from lines 175-185 may be unnecessary since the code inside is checking a condition and calling methods that already handle exceptions internally. Also, theexceptblock only prints the error without additional handling. Consider removing thistry-exceptblock to streamline the code.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary
try-exceptblock:- try: if all(permissions.values()): self.stdout.write( self.style.SUCCESS( "Access key has the required permissions." ) ) # Making the existing objects public self.make_objects_public(bucket_name) return - except Exception as e: - self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}")
189-201: Inform the user when permissions are insufficientWhen not all required permissions are granted, the script generates
permissions.jsonfor manual bucket policy update. It would be helpful to explicitly inform the user that manual intervention is needed due to insufficient permissions.Add a message to notify the user:
# Write the bucket policy to a file + self.stdout.write( + self.style.ERROR( + "Access key lacks some required permissions. Manual update is necessary." + ) + ) self.stdout.write( self.style.WARNING( "Generating permissions.json for manual bucket policy update." ) )
| try: | ||
| # Check the permissions of the access key | ||
| permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name) | ||
| except ClientError as e: | ||
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle exceptions in 'check_s3_permissions' to prevent undefined 'permissions'
If an exception occurs in self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name) and is caught, the variable permissions may not be defined when used later in if all(permissions.values()):. This can lead to a NameError. Consider adding return statements in the except blocks to prevent this issue.
Apply this diff to add return statements:
try:
# Check the permissions of the access key
permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name)
except ClientError as e:
self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}")
+ return
except Exception as e:
self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}")
+ return📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try: | |
| # Check the permissions of the access key | |
| permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name) | |
| except ClientError as e: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | |
| try: | |
| # Check the permissions of the access key | |
| permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name) | |
| except ClientError as e: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | |
| return | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | |
| return |
| bucket_name = os.environ.get("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME") | ||
| self.stdout.write(self.style.NOTICE("Checking bucket...")) | ||
| # Check if the bucket exists | ||
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add exception handling for 'head_bucket' call to handle missing bucket scenario
The call to s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) on line 159 may raise a ClientError if the bucket does not exist or access is denied. To ensure the script handles such scenarios gracefully, wrap this call in a try-except block.
Apply this diff to handle exceptions:
# Check if the bucket exists
- s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name)
+ try:
+ s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name)
+ except ClientError as e:
+ error_code = e.response['Error']['Code']
+ if error_code == '404':
+ self.stdout.write(self.style.ERROR(f"Bucket '{bucket_name}' does not exist."))
+ return
+ else:
+ self.stdout.write(f"Error checking bucket existence: {e}")
+ return📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) | |
| try: | |
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) | |
| except ClientError as e: | |
| error_code = e.response['Error']['Code'] | |
| if error_code == '404': | |
| self.stdout.write(self.style.ERROR(f"Bucket '{bucket_name}' does not exist.")) | |
| return | |
| else: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error checking bucket existence: {e}") | |
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apiserver/plane/db/management/commands/update_bucket.py (1)
169-172: Consolidate exception handling for clarityBoth
ClientErrorand generalExceptionare caught, but the same error message is printed for both. Consider consolidating the exception handling unless specific actions are needed for different exceptions.Apply this diff if applicable:
- except ClientError as e: - self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") - except Exception as e: + except Exception as e: self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}")
| try: | ||
| # Check the permissions of the access key | ||
| permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name) | ||
| except ClientError as e: | ||
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential undefined 'permissions' variable
If an exception occurs during permissions = self.check_s3_permissions(bucket_name), the permissions variable may not be defined. Accessing permissions afterwards would raise a NameError. Ensure that permissions is defined before using it, or handle this scenario appropriately.
Consider initializing permissions before the try-except block or restructuring the error handling.
| with open("permissions.json", "w") as f: | ||
| f.write(json.dumps(self.generate_bucket_policy(bucket_name))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling when writing to 'permissions.json'
When writing to the file permissions.json, there is no error handling for potential I/O issues. Consider adding a try-except block to handle exceptions such as IOError.
Apply the following diff:
+ try:
with open("permissions.json", "w") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(self.generate_bucket_policy(bucket_name)))
+ except IOError as e:
+ self.stdout.write(f"Error writing to permissions.json: {e}")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with open("permissions.json", "w") as f: | |
| f.write(json.dumps(self.generate_bucket_policy(bucket_name))) | |
| try: | |
| with open("permissions.json", "w") as f: | |
| f.write(json.dumps(self.generate_bucket_policy(bucket_name))) | |
| except IOError as e: | |
| self.stdout.write(f"Error writing to permissions.json: {e}") |
| bucket_name = os.environ.get("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME") | ||
| self.stdout.write(self.style.NOTICE("Checking bucket...")) | ||
| # Check if the bucket exists | ||
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME' is set before using it
The bucket_name retrieved from the environment variable could be None if AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME is not set. This would cause s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) to raise an error. Please add a check to ensure bucket_name is not None before proceeding.
Apply the following diff to add the check:
+ if not bucket_name:
+ self.stdout.write(self.style.ERROR("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME is not set."))
+ return📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| bucket_name = os.environ.get("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME") | |
| self.stdout.write(self.style.NOTICE("Checking bucket...")) | |
| # Check if the bucket exists | |
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) | |
| bucket_name = os.environ.get("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME") | |
| self.stdout.write(self.style.NOTICE("Checking bucket...")) | |
| if not bucket_name: | |
| self.stdout.write(self.style.ERROR("AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAME is not set.")) | |
| return | |
| # Check if the bucket exists | |
| s3_client.head_bucket(Bucket=bucket_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apiserver/plane/db/management/commands/update_bucket.py (2)
Line range hint
192-203: Refactor error handling and improve code structure.While the addition of the return statement after successful execution is good, there are still some improvements that can be made:
- The broad
except Exceptionclause should be avoided. Try to catch more specific exceptions.- The indentation of the try-except block seems unnecessary as it wraps the entire if-statement.
Consider applying this diff to address these issues:
- try: - if all(permissions.values()): - self.stdout.write( - self.style.SUCCESS( - "Access key has the required permissions." - ) - ) - # Making the existing objects public - self.make_objects_public(bucket_name) - return - except Exception as e: - self.stdout.write(f"Error: {e}") + if all(permissions.values()): + self.stdout.write( + self.style.SUCCESS( + "Access key has the required permissions." + ) + ) + try: + # Making the existing objects public + self.make_objects_public(bucket_name) + except ClientError as e: + self.stdout.write(f"Error making objects public: {e}") + return
211-220: LGTM with minor suggestion: Consider using SUCCESS style for successful file write.The addition of error handling for file writing is good and addresses a previous concern. However, consider using
self.style.SUCCESS()instead ofself.style.WARNING()for the message indicating successful file writing.Consider applying this minor change:
- self.style.WARNING( + self.style.SUCCESS( "Permissions have been written to permissions.json." )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apiserver/plane/db/management/commands/update_bucket.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apiserver/plane/db/management/commands/update_bucket.py (4)
153-166: LGTM: Improved error handling for missing bucket name.The addition of the check for
AWS_S3_BUCKET_NAMEaddresses the previous concern about potentialNonevalues. The error message is clear and actionable, improving the overall robustness of the script.
166-182: LGTM: Enhanced error handling for bucket existence check.The improved error handling for the
head_bucketcall addresses the previous concern. It now differentiates between a non-existent bucket and other errors, providing more specific feedback. This enhancement improves the script's ability to handle different scenarios gracefully.
205-210: LGTM: Clear warning message for manual policy update.The warning message about generating
permissions.jsonfor manual bucket policy update is clear and informative. The use ofself.style.WARNING()is consistent with Django's command output styling.
221-223: LGTM: Proper error handling for file writing.The error handling for IOError when writing to permissions.json is well implemented. The error message is clear and informative, and the return statement ensures proper control flow after an error occurs.
2 participants
Description
Update bucket script to handle error condtions on various permissions. Also update the bucket to return on successful update.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
permissions.jsonfile for manual updates, regardless of existing permissions.Bug Fixes
Documentation