Skip to content

[WEB-2732] fix: global css conflicts#5945

Merged
pushya22 merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix/global-css
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2732] fix: global css conflicts#5945
pushya22 merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix/global-css

Conversation

@1akhanBaheti
Copy link
Member

@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti commented Nov 4, 2024

Problem:
Web app UI was broken, due to conflict with editor tailwind CSS base directives.

Solution:
Removed @tailwind base;, @tailwind components;, and @tailwind utilities; directives.

Issues:

@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti added the 🐛bug Something isn't working label Nov 4, 2024
@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the removal of Tailwind CSS directives from the editor.css file, indicating a transition away from the Tailwind utility-first CSS framework. The file now contains custom styles for various elements, including the .ProseMirror class, task lists, images, and HTML elements within the .prose class. Enhancements include custom checkbox styles, hover effects, and media queries for responsive design, focusing on typography and spacing for consistent presentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/editor/src/styles/editor.css Removed Tailwind CSS directives; added custom styles for .ProseMirror, task lists, images, and various HTML elements. Enhanced styles include custom checkbox styles, hover effects, and media queries for responsive adjustments.

Poem

🐰 In the garden where styles bloom,
Tailwind's gone, but there's still room.
Custom checks and images bright,
With hover magic, oh what a sight!
Typography dances, spacing sings,
A world of style, oh the joy it brings! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 914811b and 6771773.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/editor/src/styles/editor.css (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/editor/src/styles/editor.css

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 09:59
@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti changed the title fix: global css conflicts [WEb-2732] fix: global css conflicts Nov 4, 2024
@1akhanBaheti 1akhanBaheti changed the title [WEb-2732] fix: global css conflicts [WEB-2732] fix: global css conflicts Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🐛bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants