[WEB-3192] fix: issue relation redirection#6441
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the issue list item component in the web application, focusing on improving issue redirection and link handling. The changes introduce a more nuanced approach to handling different issue types (regular issues and epics) by updating the redirection mechanism and link generation. The modifications enhance the component's flexibility in managing issue navigation and link creation, with specific adjustments to how issues are redirected and linked based on their type and service characteristics. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant IssueListItem
participant RedirectionService
User->>IssueListItem: Click on Issue
alt Is Epic
IssueListItem->>RedirectionService: Check Service Type
alt Epic with Specific Service Type
IssueListItem->>Browser: Open in New Tab
else
IssueListItem->>RedirectionService: Redirect to Issue
end
else Regular Issue
IssueListItem->>RedirectionService: Standard Redirection
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/core/components/issues/relations/issue-list-item.tsx (1)
59-59: Use optional chaining for better null safety.Consider using optional chaining for a more concise and safer way to handle potential undefined values.
-const { handleRedirection } = useIssuePeekOverviewRedirection(!!issue?.is_epic); +const { handleRedirection } = useIssuePeekOverviewRedirection(issue?.is_epic ?? false);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/core/components/issues/relations/issue-list-item.tsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
web/core/components/issues/relations/issue-list-item.tsx
[error] 60-60: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/core/components/issues/relations/issue-list-item.tsx (3)
65-65: LGTM! Good refactoring of the link construction.Centralizing the link construction logic improves maintainability and reduces the risk of inconsistencies.
68-75: LGTM! Good improvement to epic handling.The special handling for epics when in the issues service type improves the user experience by opening them in a new tab instead of using the peek overview.
94-94: LGTM! Consistent link usage across handlers.Good use of the centralized issueLink variable across different actions, ensuring consistency in link format.
Also applies to: 107-107
| const handleIssuePeekOverview = (issue: TIssue) => { | ||
| if (issueServiceType === EIssueServiceType.ISSUES && issue.is_epic) { | ||
| // open epics in new tab | ||
| window.open(issueLink, "_blank"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| handleRedirection(workspaceSlug, issue, isMobile); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage missing for epic handling logic
The component issue-list-item.tsx and its epic handling logic lack test coverage. Please add unit tests to cover:
- Epic redirection in issues service type (
is_epiccase) - Regular issue redirection
- Link generation for both epics and regular issues
This will help ensure the reliability of the redirection logic and prevent potential regressions.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for the new epic handling logic.
Please ensure that there are tests covering:
- Epic redirection in issues service type
- Regular issue redirection
- Link generation for both epics and regular issues
Let me help you verify the test coverage:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for relevant test files and their contents
echo "Searching for test files..."
rg -l "RelationIssueListItem" -g "*.test.*" -g "*.spec.*"
echo "Searching for epic-related test cases..."
rg "is_epic" -g "*.test.*" -g "*.spec.*" -A 5
Length of output: 557
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all test files to understand the naming pattern
echo "Finding all test files in the repository..."
fd -t f "test|spec" -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx
echo -e "\nSearching for issue-related test files..."
rg -l "issue|epic" $(fd -t f "test|spec" -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx)
echo -e "\nSearching for the component name..."
rg -l "issue-list-item" $(fd -t f "test|spec" -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx)
Length of output: 740
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test files in the component's directory and nearby
echo "Searching for test files in the component directory..."
fd . web/core/components/issues/relations -t f
echo -e "\nSearching for __tests__ directories..."
fd __tests__ -t d
echo -e "\nChecking for test files with different naming patterns..."
fd -t f ".(test|spec|stories)\.(tsx|ts|jsx|js)$"
echo -e "\nLooking for the specific component's test content..."
rg -g "*.{tsx,ts,jsx,js}" -l "issue-list-item" web/core/components/issues/relations
Length of output: 1147
3 participants
Description
Type of Change
Screenshots and Media (if applicable)
Test Scenarios
References
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements