Conversation
…g valid geometries (ref #97)
|
@artemp do you know why the |
No entirely sure ^. This looks like copy&paste mistake after refactoring. The intention always was to collect all valid geometries in clipped set and skip invalid ones. With that extra |
Okay. Looks like it landed in e589565
Yes, thanks for the more detailed explanation. Sounds good 👍 |
Note: there is a bug in codecov that we've reported to them (and they've confirmed) that makes PRs like this fail that remove code, when actually the coverage did not change. So, we can ignore this. |
|
Thanks @artemp! |
No description provided.