This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add a worker store for search insertion.#7516
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This is required as both event persistence and the background update needs access to this function.
clokep
approved these changes
May 15, 2020
Member
clokep
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm assuming this is "safe" to run on multiple workers at once since it is insert only and the event IDs should be unique?
Member
Author
|
Yeah, and we don't have caches and things to worry about. |
phil-flex
pushed a commit
to phil-flex/synapse
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2020
This is required as both event persistence and the background update needs access to this function. It should be perfectly safe for two workers to write to that table at the same time.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is required as both event persistence and the background update needs access to this function. It should be perfectly safe for two workers to write to that table at the same time.