Skip to content

Conversation

@jimson-msft
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jimson-msft jimson-msft requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2021 20:31
ArtifactName: 'deliveryoptimization-agent'
publishLocation: 'Container'

# TODO(jimson) Azure artifacts are no longer free to publish to, this task will fail as a result, bug to resolve issue here:
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jimson-msft jimson-msft Oct 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Im removing these stubs, they're in the commit history if we need to bring them back. Also since weturned on subscription billing for our ADO project, we can theoretically use this feature now.

Nick/Oscar's team own testing going forward, so if they want to use ADO package feeds to retrieve artifacts, we can bring this back. #Closed

# publishPackageMetadata: false
# vstsFeedPackagePublish: 'deliveryoptimization-plugin-apt'
# versionOption: 'custom'
# versionPublish: '$(test.package.version)'
Copy link
Collaborator

@shishirb-MSFT shishirb-MSFT Oct 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test.package.version

Do the main yamls still define this variable? If yes, consider removing them also. #Resolved

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope - they do not. Good point though

DODownloadProperty_IntegrityCheckInfo,
DODownloadProperty_IntegrityCheckMandatory,
DODownloadProperty_TotalSizeBytes,
DODownloadProperty_DisallowOnCellular, // TODO: Document this (Win11)
Copy link
Collaborator

@shishirb-MSFT shishirb-MSFT Oct 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DODownloadProperty_DisallowOnCellular

It maybe useful to keep the min build required for these new properties, as comments. Win11/22000 for the first two and the last two requires pre-release builds prior to release of next Win11 version. #Resolved

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add a comment for the first two, I'm going to delete the last two for now. By the time these become available the windows sdk will have shipped with these two.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jimson-msft jimson-msft Oct 8, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also because the enum in do_download_property would need to include these two, and people using this wouldn't have an easy way to test those two properties since they'd have to use a prerelease build (for now)

Copy link
Collaborator

@shishirb-MSFT shishirb-MSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@jimson-msft jimson-msft merged commit 6d81924 into develop Oct 8, 2021
@jimson-msft jimson-msft deleted the user/jimson/cleanup_comments branch October 8, 2021 21:39
shishirb-MSFT added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants