Improve --include-unknown message#1946
Improve --include-unknown message#1946florelis merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom felipecrs:patch-1
--include-unknown message#1946Conversation
|
Thanks @felipcrs. Hey @jedieaston just an FYI since you implemented the feature. |
jedieaston
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the correction!
I think we should still correct that count to only count things that we have in a repository, but that's another, more complex PR.
|
For some reason I can't sign the CLA: chrome_GSNx7MaXSC.mp4 |
I'll reach out to the Open Source Team to see if we can get some help. |
|
Also, I have signed it before... it's not my first contribution. :P Let me try to rebase the PR, to see if it triggers something. |
--include-unknown message
|
It looks like we may have an outage. Can you point to a previously merged PR so the team can just merge this manually if we need to go that route? |
|
It's in the winget-pkgs repo, but I suppose it's the same because of the following URL: https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs PS: changing it manually to winget-cli does not help. |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
I just signed it now (maybe I haven't signed it before?). |
|
I believe it needs to be signed for each repository. The check is still not responding though. |
|
I tried to enter in https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/winget-cli, but it says: |
|
I will rebase the PR to see if it helps. |
|
I have no idea what will help at this point. I'm just watching the "license/cla Expected - Waiting for status to be reported" line in the build. |
|
Thanks @felipecrs! |
|
Don't mention it! That was a very simple one! Thanks for WinGet! |


Here is how it was before:
The current message gives the impression that using
--include-unknowncould potentially show all the 10 packages mentioned, which is a mistake. In fact, it would only show packages who have candidates in the WinGet repo.So, I'm addressing this with this PR.
But honestly, I would prefer that this was transparent to the user, i.e. not show any message at all about unknown packages.
Refs #1692
Refs #1765
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow