MTA-6439: grammar issues#352
Conversation
eab5940 to
86d46da
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anarnold97 Thanks for re-framing the sentences! Could you please add back details about the locations where the template files are stored? It was requested by Ramon. Thank you!
"To use the helm templates to generate assets, save the Kubernetes YAML templates, for example, ConfigMap or Deployment, in the templates directory present in the root directory of the Helm chart. You must save non-Kubernetes templates, for example, Dockerfile, in the files/konveyor path in the Helm chart root directory and save the values.yaml file at the root directory of the Helm chart."
mpershina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added some suggestions and fixes, otherwise, LGTM
@Pkylas007 This one actually looks like it should be a part of a procedure or even prerequisites. We do not instruct users to do something outside of a procedure/prerequisites, apart from requesting actions in some admonition, for example, Important. Also, this text could use some simplification Agreed! I wouldn't mind adding this instruction as an IMPORTANT admonition. This module is a result of an actual internal stakeholder request for a few things to be documented, including where each file is located :) |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 28 minutes and 1 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated AsciiDoc documentation for generating deployment assets with Helm charts. Changes clarify prerequisites for file placement, restructure examples with improved formatting, add explicit placeholder explanations, and reorganize priority ordering for configuration values ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Signed-off-by: A.Arnold <anarnold@redhat.com>
2bdc19b to
148a4d7
Compare
…e.adoc Co-authored-by: Mariya Pershina <53339200+mpershina@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/topics/mta-cli/proc_generate_deployment_assets_values_file.adoc`:
- Around line 59-68: The placeholders for the discovery manifest are
inconsistent: the command uses `<path_to_discovery-manifest>` (hyphen) while the
where section defines `<path_to_discovery_manifest>` (underscore); update all
occurrences so they match exactly (choose one form and apply it to the command
example and the where definitions) — specifically edit the command line that
contains `--input _<path_to_discovery-manifest>_` and/or the where entry
`_<path_to_discovery_manifest>_` so both use the same token (e.g.,
`<path_to_discovery_manifest>`), ensuring `--input`, the inline code sample, and
the corresponding where description all reference the identical placeholder.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 61fe2ab3-e266-4c69-b72d-ced781f776c7
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/topics/mta-cli/proc_generate_deployment_assets_values_file.adoc
…e.adoc Co-authored-by: Mariya Pershina <53339200+mpershina@users.noreply.github.com>
…e.adoc Co-authored-by: Mariya Pershina <53339200+mpershina@users.noreply.github.com>
| where: | ||
| `_<path_to_helm_chart>_`:: Specifies the directory containing the Helm chart. | ||
| `_<path_to_discovery_manifest>_`:: Specifies the location of the discovery manifest file. | ||
| `_<location_of_deployment_manifests>_`:: Specifies the output directory for the generated manifests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mpershina -this look weird when it renders, please can you have a look-see:
Is it ok to change to
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I think I know where the issue might be :-D
That's why we always need a preview. So, we basically need to have an empty line after where. I added my suggestion above
…e.adoc Co-authored-by: Mariya Pershina <53339200+mpershina@users.noreply.github.com>
| + | ||
| The variable priority hierarchy for generating deployment manifests is as follows: | ||
|
|
||
| * **Priority 1: The `--set` command flag**: Any value specified with this flag has the highest priority and overrides variables defined in either the `values.yaml` file or the discovery manifest. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| * **Priority 1: The `--set` command flag**: Any value specified with this flag has the highest priority and overrides variables defined in either the `values.yaml` file or the discovery manifest. | |
| * **(Priority 1) The `--set` command flag**: Any value specified with this flag has the highest priority and overrides variables defined in either the `values.yaml` file or the discovery manifest. |
Please shall we remove too many colons in a line here? The format looks a little weird, WDYT?
Summary by CodeRabbit
PREVIEW