Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 45 minutes and 10 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughReordered AsciiDoc front-matter in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| :imagesdir: topics/images | ||
| :topicsdir: topics | ||
|
|
||
| :_mod-docs-content-type: ATTRIBUTES |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the discussion in the MMS meeting
PR Review Report: CQA and fixes for MTA CLISummaryThe PR is now largely aligned with team decisions regarding documentation standards. While initially flagged for inconsistency, it has been confirmed that the removal of the inclusive language statement and the ASSEMBLY attribute are desired architectural changes for this guide. Updated AnalysisInclusive Language Removal (Confirmed)
Attribute:: mod-docs-content-type: ASSEMBLY
Attribute Ordering & toclevels Conflict
Shared Template Update
Revised VerdictReady to Merge (with minor technical adjustment)
Recommended Final Actions
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adoc (1)
17-51: Consider impact of removing YAML syntax highlighting.The manifest example was converted from a
[source, yaml]block to a plain delimited block. This removes syntax highlighting, which can reduce readability for structured data formats like YAML. If this change is part of a documentation-wide standardization effort, that's fine—but if syntax highlighting was removed unintentionally, consider restoring it:💡 Alternative with syntax highlighting
-[subs="+quotes"] +[source,yaml] ---- manifest:🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adoc` around lines 17 - 51, The manifest example lost YAML syntax highlighting when converted from a [source,yaml] block to a plain delimited block (the block starting with "[subs="+quotes"]" and the "manifest:" example); restore readability by changing the block back to a source block with YAML highlighting (use the [source,yaml] directive for the delimited manifest example) so the manifest, labels, annotations, env, routes, processes, and buildPacks sections render with proper syntax coloring.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adoc`:
- Line 17: Remove the extraneous attribute [subs="+quotes"] from the manifest
sample block in ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adoc; locate the block header
containing [subs="+quotes"] and delete that attribute so the YAML manifest
sample (the static content) is rendered without unnecessary quote substitution
configuration.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adoc`:
- Around line 17-51: The manifest example lost YAML syntax highlighting when
converted from a [source,yaml] block to a plain delimited block (the block
starting with "[subs="+quotes"]" and the "manifest:" example); restore
readability by changing the block back to a source block with YAML highlighting
(use the [source,yaml] directive for the delimited manifest example) so the
manifest, labels, annotations, env, routes, processes, and buildPacks sections
render with proper syntax coloring.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 706e0c8a-fa63-4f84-8c3a-761bff807536
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
assemblies/cli-guide/assembly_analyzing-applications-using-profiles.adocassemblies/cli-guide/assembly_analyzing-nonjava-applications.adocdocs/cli-guide/master.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/con_intro-to-the-cli.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/proc_analyze-unsupported-provider.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_analysis-report-sections.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_available-openrewrite-recipes.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_discovery_manifest_sample.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_effort-level-estimation.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_modify-application-profile.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-cli-analyze-flags.adocdocs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-tech-tags.adocdocs/topics/templates/document-attributes.adoc
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- assemblies/cli-guide/assembly_analyzing-nonjava-applications.adoc
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- docs/topics/mta-cli/proc_analyze-unsupported-provider.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_modify-application-profile.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_analysis-report-sections.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-cli-analyze-flags.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_effort-level-estimation.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_available-openrewrite-recipes.adoc
- assemblies/cli-guide/assembly_analyzing-applications-using-profiles.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/con_intro-to-the-cli.adoc
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-tech-tags.adoc
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- docs/topics/templates/document-attributes.adoc
- docs/cli-guide/master.adoc
Tracked under:
Preview: https://mpershina.github.io/Previews/MTA/CLI-preview.html
Summary by CodeRabbit