Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeFavelier
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is a follow-up of #6460(comment) and adds a RST overview table from a functional point of view.
In my opinion, such a table improves visibility on the refactor/advancement of mayavi-based features of the Brain object.

I put all the functions I could find as a first step but it may be more useful to resize to the subset of functions used in practice and prioritize the tasks maybe as an ordered TODO list. Any feedback is welcome.

@agramfort
Copy link
Member

agramfort commented Jul 1, 2019 via email

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6515 into master will increase coverage by 1.39%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6515      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.91%   89.31%   +1.39%     
==========================================
  Files         413      413              
  Lines       74602    74537      -65     
  Branches    12301    12292       -9     
==========================================
+ Hits        65588    66569     +981     
+ Misses       6178     5127    -1051     
- Partials     2836     2841       +5

@GuillaumeFavelier
Copy link
Contributor Author

no need to reimplement 100% of the API of pysurfer.

I agree with you @agramfort , we need only what's used of course.

See what breaks in the doc build with pyvista and you'll see what people have actually a chance to use.

I like the idea and this was also suggested by @larsoner in this comment I think.

But as the refactor is not yet completed, would you be okay to start with this version of the table and refine it during the process?

@agramfort
Copy link
Member

agramfort commented Jul 1, 2019 via email

@GuillaumeFavelier
Copy link
Contributor Author

The objective is to tick the boxes we need.

@larsoner larsoner merged commit e922e9f into mne-tools:master Jul 5, 2019
@GuillaumeFavelier GuillaumeFavelier deleted the brain_table branch July 5, 2019 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants