Makefile: add missing document pages

[vbatts]

Closes #244

Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts vbatts@hashbangbash.com

[wking]

Do we need these last two? I think they're metadata, and not part of the spec itself. runtime-spec does not include them in the generated spec or link to them from any files which are part of the generated spec.

[vbatts]

I debated about those two because they are some what boiler plate. I'll
remove them.

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM W. Trevor King notifications@github.com
wrote:

In Makefile
#275 (comment)
:

@@ -26,7 +26,13 @@ DOC_FILES :=
project.md
media-types.md
manifest.md \

• serialization.md
• descriptor.md \
• image-layout.md \
• serialization.md \
• layer.md \
• GOVERNANCE.md \
• RELEASES.md

Do we need these last two? I think they're metadata, and not part of the
spec itself. runtime-spec does not include them in the generated spec
https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/blob/22c29c18eddc75ccee9f6b202f61524f29653c5f/Makefile#L23-L38
or link to them from any files which are part of the generated spec.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/275/files/13755da234e41fb12131570e58514f5ef7ab7866#r77881516,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEF6Y_jyR2IsQVGlvy89qnc9-Mey352ks5qnwbPgaJpZM4J3Oq0
.

[wking]

Do we want a table of contents (like runtime-spec has 1)? If so, is
that part of this PR, or a separate issue?

[philips]

LGTM

@wking separate issue

[wking]

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:18:31PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:

@wking separate issue

Sounds good. In that case, 3f4c120 looks good to me.

[RobDolinMS]

It would be good to add a Table of Contents as @wking suggests, but I recommend doing that as a another issue/PR so this can be merged. /cc @vbatts

[philips]

cc @opencontainers/image-spec-maintainers Please LGTM

[stevvooe]

LGTM