Skip to content

MCO-1675: Update API for Status Reporting needs (REBASED)#2442

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 7 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
isabella-janssen:mco-1675-rebase
Sep 11, 2025
Merged

MCO-1675: Update API for Status Reporting needs (REBASED)#2442
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 7 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
isabella-janssen:mco-1675-rebase

Conversation

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen commented Aug 11, 2025

This recreates #2383 with an added commit to resolve the PR's merge conflicts.

Work included

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Aug 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 11, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1675 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This recreates #2383 with an added commit to resolve the PR's merge conflicts.

Work included

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 11, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Hello @isabella-janssen! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 11, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JoelSpeed commented Aug 12, 2025

/retitle MCO-1675: Update API for Status Reporting needs (REBASED)
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title (WIP) MCO-1675: Update API for Status Reporting needs (REBASED) MCO-1675: Update API for Status Reporting needs (REBASED) Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1675 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This recreates #2383 with an added commit to resolve the PR's merge conflicts.

Work included

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 213cdac and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8187a76 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 88b2b21 and 1 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

False positives, new required field has a new optional parent

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 13, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

False positives, new required field has a new optional parent

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 88b2b21 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a30da32 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a30da32 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@JoelSpeed It looks like the verify-crd-schema test override is no longer being respected.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overriding the verify-crd-schema check because the new required field is a child of a new optional field.

/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 8, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Details

In response to this:

Overriding the verify-crd-schema check because the new required field is a child of a new optional field.

/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d394d8c and 1 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8634aa4 and 0 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/hold

Revision daaca27 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2025
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8634aa4 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8634aa4 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8634aa4 and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 1 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@everettraven
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like both the required tests are failing on the known commatrix issue that is unrelated to this change. Overriding.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2, ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

Details

In response to this:

Looks like both the required tests are failing on the known commatrix issue that is unrelated to this change. Overriding.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

4 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD be976da and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e515d9c and 1 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e515d9c and 2 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9116741 and 1 for PR HEAD daaca27 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 11, 2025

@isabella-janssen: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure daaca27 link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn daaca27 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 2f4b91e into openshift:master Sep 11, 2025
24 of 27 checks passed
@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen deleted the mco-1675-rebase branch September 11, 2025 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants