Skip to content

Ensure priorityClass is set on AWS CCM#38

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Danil-Grigorev:priority-aws
May 7, 2021
Merged

Ensure priorityClass is set on AWS CCM#38
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Danil-Grigorev:priority-aws

Conversation

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Danil-Grigorev Danil-Grigorev commented May 7, 2021

Satisfy requirements of "[sig-arch] Managed cluster should ensure platform components have system-* priority class associated"

Full log: https://console.build01.ci.openshift.org/api/kubernetes/api/v1/namespaces/ci-op-6t1wq5k4/pods/e2e-aws-ccm-openshift-e2e-test/log?container=test

Increase weight on affinity settings to ensure the two pods are not scheduled on the same Node in edge cases.

Reasoning:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/guaranteed-scheduling-critical-addon-pods/#marking-pod-as-critical

OpenStack manifests have that same field. Cluster will not become healthy during install if those pods are not healthy. Not system-node-critical as provisioned Nodes could operate without these pods running.

Satisfy requirements of "[sig-arch] Managed cluster should ensure platform components have system-* priority class associated"
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from mandre and mdbooth May 7, 2021 00:05
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@lobziik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lobziik commented May 7, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 7, 2021

@Danil-Grigorev: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ccm 29d46fe link /test e2e-aws-ccm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we add to the description why this is system-cluster-critical as opposed to the other priority classes please?

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Openstack manifests are system-cluster-critical. It could be system-node-critical but it shouldn't be. Cluster during initialization is not healthy if these pods were not healthy. @JoelSpeed

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 7, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 7, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c8048d0 into openshift:master May 7, 2021
Danil-Grigorev pushed a commit to Danil-Grigorev/cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator that referenced this pull request May 7, 2021
Ensure priorityClass is set on AWS CCM
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants