Skip to content

Conversation

@cloudbehl
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Ankush Behl cloudbehl@gmail.com

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 24, 2020
@a2batic
Copy link
Contributor

a2batic commented Nov 24, 2020

/test e2e-gcp-console

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 24, 2020
@cloudbehl cloudbehl force-pushed the update-e2e-prow-ceph branch from ad9b4f5 to 0cf7b93 Compare November 25, 2020 05:02
Signed-off-by: Ankush Behl <cloudbehl@gmail.com>
@cloudbehl cloudbehl force-pushed the update-e2e-prow-ceph branch from 0cf7b93 to 47a5acd Compare November 25, 2020 11:37
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cloudbehl, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 25, 2020
@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 25, 2020
@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@christoph-jerolimov
Copy link
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a35dda8 into openshift:master Nov 26, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Nov 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants