Skip to content

machines: Extract root disk sizes to constants#5169

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:const-disk-sizes
Dec 5, 2021
Merged

machines: Extract root disk sizes to constants#5169
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:const-disk-sizes

Conversation

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was looking at this issue:
openshift/openshift-docs#35793
Which then led me to wonder exactly what the defaults are per
platform for disk sizes.

And then I stumbled into this 120 vs 128 thing that as best
I can tell from the git history is mostly an accident. If someone
happens to know differently (e.g. can/should we unify on 120 or 128?)
then that'd be good.

In the meantime, an additional benefit here is that if one does
e.g. git grep -i volume.*size these constants will turn up.
It took me a little while to figure out how to backtrack from
the Terraform code to this. (The lines here only contained
Size which is too generic to grep)

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Aug 31, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@e-tienne e-tienne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 26, 2021
@staebler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

staebler commented Dec 3, 2021

@cgwalters Sorry that this got lost. Would you mind rebasing this when you get a chance?
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2021
I was looking at this issue:
openshift/openshift-docs#35793
Which then led me to wonder exactly what the defaults are per
platform for disk sizes.

And then I stumbled into this 120 vs 128 thing that as best
I can tell from the git history is mostly an accident.  If someone
happens to know differently (e.g. can/should we unify on 120 or 128?)
then that'd be good.

In the meantime, an additional benefit here is that if one does
e.g. `git grep -i volume.*size` these constants will turn up.
It took me a little while to figure out how to backtrack from
the Terraform code to this.  (The lines here only contained
`Size` which is too generic to grep)
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Dec 4, 2021
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cgwalters commented Dec 4, 2021 via email

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 4, 2021

@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-provider-network 494afcf6c785dd5fa399ed2efb29dc9191f496d4 link /test e2e-openstack-provider-network
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade 1cfe8b6 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws 1cfe8b6 link false /test okd-e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel8 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel8
ci/prow/e2e-crc 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-crc
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-kuryr 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-openstack-kuryr
ci/prow/e2e-ovirt 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-ovirt
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 1cfe8b6 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@staebler staebler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 4, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: staebler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 170a59b into openshift:master Dec 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants