[TEST_ONLY][RELEASE-v1.4] Backport e2e encryption enable encryption#1188
[TEST_ONLY][RELEASE-v1.4] Backport e2e encryption enable encryption#1188nak3 wants to merge 12 commits into
Conversation
…#13005) * Add certificate reconciler for internal certs * Fix cert path * Temporary use local networking repo * Support internal-encryption configuration * Use const for cert name * Fix lint * rm blank line * Drop unused variable * Use one line style * Use one line code * Update net-kourier nightly bumping knative.dev/net-kourier d758682...b9b1e8b: > b9b1e8b Use `internal-encryption` to deploy internal certificates automatically (# 855) > 427434c bump kind and k8s versions in kind-e2e tests (# 859) Signed-off-by: Knative Automation <automation@knative.team> * Verify SecretPKKey as well * Do not drop activator always in the path * Comment about ctrl-ca suffix Co-authored-by: Knative Automation <automation@knative.team>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nak3 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3899d2f to
afa6f3c
Compare
|
|
|
/retest |
|
@nak3: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
| local SERVERLESS_DIR=$(mktemp -d) | ||
| local CURRENT_DIR=$(pwd) | ||
| git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-knative/serverless-operator.git ${SERVERLESS_DIR} | ||
| git clone -b support-passthrough --depth 1 https://github.com/nak3/serverless-operator.git ${SERVERLESS_DIR} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will have to revert this I guess when S-O work is done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, that's correct.
This PR has a lot of manual change so I will clean up it after
#1183 and S-O work were done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just in case, I think we don't need to merge this (and you don't need to review this) until S-O was merged.
This PR just demonstrates that the backport with enabling option works fine.
#1183 is backporting the e2e encryption but not enabled the option.
This patch tries to run CI with
internal-encryptionturned on.