[RELEASE-v1.4] Support config to deploy internal certificates automatically (#13005)#1183
Conversation
|
@nak3 as a side note and independently of the failures above, I suspect for tests to run properly since we merged first #1173 we need to also merge openshift-knative/serverless-operator#1642. Ideally the latter needs to get in first. |
|
/retest |
ea6abd6 to
45b71b9
Compare
|
/retest |
bc6e49f to
b644881
Compare
…#13005) * Add certificate reconciler for internal certs * Fix cert path * Temporary use local networking repo * Support internal-encryption configuration * Use const for cert name * Fix lint * rm blank line * Drop unused variable * Use one line style * Use one line code * Update net-kourier nightly bumping knative.dev/net-kourier d758682...b9b1e8b: > b9b1e8b Use `internal-encryption` to deploy internal certificates automatically (# 855) > 427434c bump kind and k8s versions in kind-e2e tests (# 859) Signed-off-by: Knative Automation <automation@knative.team> * Verify SecretPKKey as well * Do not drop activator always in the path * Comment about ctrl-ca suffix Co-authored-by: Knative Automation <automation@knative.team>
6eadb1a to
9b93484
Compare
/retest |
|
/test 49-e2e-aws-ocp-49 |
|
@skonto This PR is ready to go now. Could you please take a look this and openshift-knative/net-kourier#23? (#1188 also verified with enabling internal-encryption .) |
|
Same error? |
|
Yeah, I will look into it tomorrow. |
|
Creation of the ns failed earlier seems infra. |
|
Ah, you are right. |
|
@nak3 there is a file added: cmd/activator/.main.go.swp. I guess we need to remove it. |
|
No, I removed it. It was added by mistake on upstream and removed knative@92b11a8 . |
|
Yes we should remove it its garbage. |
|
/test 49-e2e-aws-ocp-49 |
|
@nak3: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@nak3 this seems ready. LGTM but can we remove the swp file? |
|
Nah, this PR is removing the swap file. It will be removed when you merged this PR. |
|
Ok my bad misread the github sign. What about the order of merging should we do the S-O one first? |
|
Either is fine. So. I updated S-O for ready. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nak3, skonto The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This patch cherry-pics knative@58cce54.