Skip to content

bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi…#614

Closed
ingvagabund wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
ingvagabund:backport-upstream-100128
Closed

bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi…#614
ingvagabund wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
ingvagabund:backport-upstream-100128

Conversation

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

…cates|SchedulerPriorities: adjust some e2e tests to run in a single node cluster scenario

Backporting kubernetes#100128

/hold

Until the PR gets properly reviewed upstream.

…cates|SchedulerPriorities: adjust some e2e tests to run in a single node cluster scenario
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. labels Mar 11, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ingvagabund: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

@ingvagabund ingvagabund changed the title UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi… bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi… Mar 11, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 11, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934085, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kasturinarra

Details

In response to this:

bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund
To complete the pull request process, please assign sttts after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @sttts in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 24, 2021

@ingvagabund: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd 9e08d2f link /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws-downgrade 9e08d2f link /test e2e-aws-downgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closed in favor of #665

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934085. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredi…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund ingvagabund deleted the backport-upstream-100128 branch April 14, 2021 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants