Skip to content

templates: increase kubelet loglevel for better troubleshooting#681

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
sjenning:increase-kubelet-loglevel
May 5, 2019
Merged

templates: increase kubelet loglevel for better troubleshooting#681
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
sjenning:increase-kubelet-loglevel

Conversation

@sjenning
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sjenning sjenning commented Apr 29, 2019

@sjenning sjenning added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 29, 2019
@sjenning sjenning force-pushed the increase-kubelet-loglevel branch 2 times, most recently from fa258af to c895e07 Compare May 1, 2019 16:25
@sjenning sjenning changed the title DO NOT MERGE: increase kubelet loglevel to debug pod cleanup issue templates: increase kubelet loglevel for better troubleshooting May 1, 2019
@sjenning
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sjenning commented May 1, 2019

/hold cancel
let actually merge this. much of the helpful tracing in the kubelet is at loglevel 3.
@rphillips

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 1, 2019
@sjenning
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sjenning commented May 1, 2019

/assign @runcom

@sjenning sjenning force-pushed the increase-kubelet-loglevel branch from c895e07 to e5ef8d8 Compare May 1, 2019 16:55
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cgwalters commented May 2, 2019

/test e2e-aws-op

@runcom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

runcom commented May 2, 2019

we're increasing the timeout in #692 (cause we believe it's just us taking longer since we've added another test to the op suite).

/retest
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 2, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented May 2, 2019

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: runcom, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 2, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 3, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 4, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@runcom
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

runcom commented May 4, 2019

please rebase to pick up the CI fix

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 4, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 4, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 5, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 5, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented May 5, 2019

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1687ce7 into openshift:master May 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jlebon jlebon Awaiting requested review from jlebon

@runcom runcom Awaiting requested review from runcom

Assignees

@runcom runcom

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@sjenning @cgwalters @runcom @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot