Bump timeout for e2e-aws-op#692
Conversation
|
I'm fine with this if we're just timing out on the latest test added (quorum guard afaict) |
|
/approve |
|
/lgtm Thanks @cgwalters @runcom ! |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, hexfusion, runcom The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test e2e-aws-upgrade |
|
|
@cgwalters that just looks like the worker pool is still rolling and reconciling to me |
We seem to be taking longer here.
e6bfb28 to
cde17af
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
120 seems awfully high? i assume we just trying it to see if it's truly a timeout issue? |
Right. |
|
I find myself getting confused by |
|
Paste from @sjenning |
|
Noticing in the CI artifacts logs that one of the worker daemons has no logs whatsoever edit: double checked and it was a worker daemon see: |
|
@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@cgwalters your patch is reporting unavailable=0 when nodes aren't ready tho, which is what makes progress if everything is available. |
|
Closing in favor of #697 |
We seem to be taking longer here.