Skip to content

USHIFT-1098: add minor-version upgrade scenario#1989

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 11 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
dhellmann:USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario
Jul 16, 2023
Merged

USHIFT-1098: add minor-version upgrade scenario#1989
openshift-merge-robot merged 11 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
dhellmann:USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario

Conversation

@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dhellmann dhellmann commented Jul 3, 2023

Depends on openshift/release#40720

/assign @pmtk

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 3, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 3, 2023

@dhellmann: This pull request references USHIFT-1098 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

/assign @pmtk

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 3, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from jerpeter1 and jogeo July 3, 2023 20:37
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 3, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 3, 2023

@dhellmann: This pull request references USHIFT-1098 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Depends on openshift/release#40720

/assign @pmtk

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch from d38e1a0 to d4217e3 Compare July 3, 2023 20:41
@pmtk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

pmtk commented Jul 4, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests

@pmtk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

pmtk commented Jul 4, 2023

I don't see RF artifacts for the scenarios. Are we missing bin/ci_phase_test.sh?
#1988 :)

@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch 2 times, most recently from fca555c to 157976f Compare July 11, 2023 21:18
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 12, 2023
@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch from 157976f to 4c09098 Compare July 12, 2023 17:47
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 12, 2023
@dhellmann dhellmann changed the title WIP: USHIFT-1098: add minor-version upgrade scenario USHIFT-1098: add minor-version upgrade scenario Jul 12, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 12, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test microshift-metal-tests

Comment thread test/bin/scenario.sh Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We parse the version within the Makefile, too. Maybe we should add targets there to print out the values we need so we're only doing the parsing in 1 place?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fyi: we already have https://github.com/openshift/microshift/blob/main/Makefile#L87-L93 so we might extend that and grep specific variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image build script looks at the RPM in the local repo. I think that's going to be safer long term, since that's the actual package we're trying to install. I'll rework things so that script and scenario.sh use the same logic.

@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/hold

Let's let the metal tests run. I see some changes that snuck in as part of a botched rebase, and I'll clean those up, too.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 12, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think the metal test job will be fixed in part by openshift/release#41143

@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch from 4c09098 to 3434212 Compare July 12, 2023 19:55
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test microshift-metal-tests

1 similar comment
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test microshift-metal-tests

@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 14, 2023
Comment thread test/bin/get_latest_rpm_version.sh Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a chance we'll get more than one RPM? If so, we should use sort | tail -1 on the result of find

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The framework automation prevents it, but I'll push a fix anyway after the tests finish running with this version.

@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I added a commit to ensure the web server is started. We may end up with merge conflicts, because I see that same change in some of @pmtk's PRs.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 14, 2023
@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch from c5f9717 to 06a1871 Compare July 15, 2023 12:58
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 15, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/test microshift-metal-tests

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test microshift-metal-tests

@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pmtk I ended up moving the "fake" RPMs to their own repositories. We will need to add another repo for the "upgrade from main to this PR" tests that @copejon is working on, and we may have others in the future. Let's keep the RPMs for different types of builds separate so it's easy to reason about what we should find in any given repository.

@dhellmann dhellmann force-pushed the USHIFT-1098-4.13-4.14-upgrade-scenario branch from 9f2cbe6 to 1796ec3 Compare July 15, 2023 17:22
@dhellmann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test microshift-metal-tests

@ggiguash
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 16, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 16, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhellmann, ggiguash

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 16, 2023

@dhellmann: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm 1796ec3 link false /test microshift-e2e-arm
ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm 1796ec3 link false /test e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e4a746f into openshift:main Jul 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants