Bug 1748212: [4.1]: Tighten cipher usage

[stlaz]

Use the cipher suites that are provided by the OpenShift library-go
as the reasonable defaults.

cc @enj @mrogers950

---

I think I'll need to create separate bugzillas for each the backport, the original fix included...

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stlaz: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[4.1]: Tighten cipher usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stlaz: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[4.1]: Tighten cipher usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[eparis]

This PR has no review, no bug attached (which depends on a 4.2 bug), and thus no QE review in master. All of these things need done.

[sttts]

/lgtm
/approve

[sttts]

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1748212, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1748210 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1748212: [4.1]: Tighten cipher usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[stlaz]

Added a BZ and the fix to travis CI so that the tests should pass now.

[stlaz]

Travis was still using the old config file, trying to bump go version for its builds to see if this makes it use the new config instead

[stlaz]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1748212, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[mfojtik]

/lgtm

[mfojtik]

/approve

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, stlaz, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stlaz: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1748212 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1748212: [4.1]: Tighten cipher usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.