Skip to content

Conversation

@stevsmit
Copy link
Member

@stevsmit stevsmit commented Mar 18, 2021

For 4.5

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929240

The BZ log suggests that this should be changed in 4.5 and 4.6, however this issue has already been changed in 4.6. Please see openshift/oc#673 if confirmation is needed.

Direct link to doc preview: https://deploy-preview-30678--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/operators/admin/olm-managing-custom-catalogs.html

No QA needed.

Formatting errors

Fixes minor formatting error

Fixes minor error

Formatting

Formatting minor change

Formatting minor change

Formatting minor change
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 18, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2021

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit 078b668

https://deploy-preview-30678--osdocs.netlify.app

@codyhoag codyhoag added this to the Next Release milestone Mar 19, 2021
@codyhoag codyhoag added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Mar 19, 2021
@codyhoag codyhoag changed the title Adds warning label to Operator catalog image BZ#1929240 Adds warning label to Operator catalog image Mar 19, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@codyhoag codyhoag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the admonition is for callout 4, perhaps it could be attached to it instead of at the bottom? Maybe something like this?:

<4> This flag is currently required due to a known issue with multiple architecture support.
+
[WARNING]
====
If the `filter-by-os` remains unset or set to any value other than `.*`, filtering out different architectures changes the digest of the manifest list, also known as a "multi-arch image", which causes deployments of those images and Operators on disconnected clusters to fail. For more information, see link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890951[BZ#1890951].
====
<5>...

Other than that, LGTM!

@codyhoag codyhoag added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 19, 2021
@stevsmit
Copy link
Member Author

Hey Cody,

That doesn't work. I tried that initially but it interrupts the number. The reason it interrupts the number is because this is a callout list, and asciidoctor doesn't support putting a warning in the middle of a call out list (see asciidoctor/asciidoctor#1478 (comment)). I'll message you a picture of what that looks like when I tried it, but here's an attach picture:
image

I found this kind of frustrating because admonition blocks within a callout actually do work, but only when the codeblock is not part of an ordered list (see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/installing/installing_aws/installing-aws-network-customizations.html#installation-aws-config-yaml_installing-aws-network-customizations). That example looks much better but my understanding is that it isn't possible here. I worked with Alex on this BZ for a bit before we had to settle.

If you want me to wrestle around with it a bit more, I'm happy to, though.

@codyhoag
Copy link
Contributor

@stevsmit Interesting; I knew I had done that before, but I guess my experiences were never in an ordered list. That is a weird issue 😵

I'll go ahead and merge, since we've got our hands tied. Thanks for the explanation!

@codyhoag codyhoag merged commit 75e606d into openshift:enterprise-4.5 Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.5 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants