Skip to content

OSDOCS-9587: Documented the AWS WZ Day 0 and Day 2 release note#71333

Merged
kelbrown20 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.15from
dfitzmau:OSDOCS-9587
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

OSDOCS-9587: Documented the AWS WZ Day 0 and Day 2 release note#71333
kelbrown20 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.15from
dfitzmau:OSDOCS-9587

Conversation

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE on PTO, but Yunfei (QE) approved the feature doc. Stephanie added a LGTM to confirm. This release note is urgent as I am on PTO next week.

Additional information:
#69537

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Fri Feb 16 16:13:32 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://71333--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-9587 branch 4 times, most recently from 8fac5ae to 40f0c28 Compare February 9, 2024 11:19
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 9, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 13, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 13, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kalexand-rh commented Feb 13, 2024

@mgahagan73, this is slightly outside of your usual install area, but will you please confirm this RN? We need to get this one merged this week, too.

1 similar comment
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kalexand-rh commented Feb 13, 2024

@mgahagan73, this is slightly outside of your usual install area, but will you please confirm this RN? We need to get this one merged this week, too.

mtulio
mtulio reviewed Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Comment thread release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
mtulio
mtulio reviewed Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mtulio mtulio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @dfitzmau .

Comment thread release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
Comment thread release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
Comment thread release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
mtulio
mtulio approved these changes Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mtulio mtulio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2024
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Feb 15, 2024

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 15, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 15, 2024
mletalie
mletalie reviewed Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Feb 15, 2024
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Feb 15, 2024

Hi @mletalie . Just to let you know that I'll comment in the URLs when #69537 is merged. I'll do this before requesting a merge review. Thanks for picking up the review.

@mletalie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mletalie commented Feb 15, 2024

Hi @mletalie . Just to let you know that I'll comment in the URLs when #69537 is merged. I'll do this before requesting a merge review. Thanks for picking up the review.

Sure thing and thanks for letting me know!

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 15, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mletalie
mletalie reviewed Feb 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Feb 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 16, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
[<!--- Optional: Include additional context or expand the description here.--->

](https://github.com//pull/69537)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 16, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
#69537

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 16, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-9587 branch 2 times, most recently from 2057582 to c9d476c Compare February 16, 2024 15:46
@sjstout
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sjstout commented Feb 16, 2024

lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 16, 2024

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dfitzmau commented Feb 16, 2024

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 16, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci Bot
Loading

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-9587 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-9587

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE on PTO, but Yunfei (QE) approved the feature doc. Stephanie added a LGTM to confirm. This release note is urgent as I am on PTO next week.

Additional information:
#69537

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Feb 16, 2024
@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Feb 16, 2024
kelbrown20
kelbrown20 reviewed Feb 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updates LGTM!

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 merged commit c0a101c into openshift:enterprise-4.15 Feb 16, 2024
@yunjiang29
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

yunjiang29 commented Feb 18, 2024

LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mletalie mletalie mletalie left review comments

+2 more reviewers

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 kelbrown20 left review comments

@mtulio mtulio mtulio approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@mtulio mtulio

@mletalie mletalie

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@dfitzmau @openshift-ci-robot @ocpdocs-previewbot @kalexand-rh @mletalie @sjstout @yunjiang29 @mtulio @kelbrown20