Skip to content

OSDOCS-13901 NetObserv 1.9 CLI documentation updates#93795

Merged
kcarmichael08 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:no-1.9from
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-13901
Jun 5, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS-13901 NetObserv 1.9 CLI documentation updates#93795
kcarmichael08 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:no-1.9from
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-13901

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented May 27, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 27, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 27, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 27, 2025
Comment thread modules/network-observability-netobserv-cli-reference.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/network-observability-netobserv-cli-reference.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/network-observability-netobserv-cli-reference.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/network-observability-netobserv-cli-reference.adoc Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jotak jotak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @gwynnemonahan 🥳

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 4, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 4, 2025
Comment thread modules/network-observability-netobserv-cli-reference.adoc Outdated
@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan Just a minor nit. Otherwise LGTM.

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 5, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 5, 2025
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 5, 2025
@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The original text isn't capitalized but aren't table cell contents supposed to be capitalized? Maybe this is an exception. I'll go ahead and merge but thought I would note it.

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 merged commit b2b3419 into openshift:no-1.9 Jun 5, 2025
2 checks passed
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants