Skip to content

OSDOCS-15175 [NETOBSERV] Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+#95709

Merged
mburke5678 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-15175
Jul 7, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS-15175 [NETOBSERV] Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+#95709
mburke5678 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-15175

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Jul 7, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15175 [NETOBSERV] Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+

Version(s):
4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15175

Link to docs preview:
https://95709--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.html

QE review:
QE Review is not needed for this PR.

Additional information:
Found during cherry-picks. Applies to 4.14+ as it is fixed in 4.12 manual cp #95608

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 7, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 7, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 7, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 7, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 7, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 7, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit e97f0d7 into openshift:main Jul 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: #95709 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":

Applying: Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: #95709 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.15":

Applying: Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Fix NetObserv 1.9 advisory link 4.14+

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95729

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95730

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95731

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95732

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95733

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan It appears that the Network Observability Operator 1.9 are not in OCP 4.14 or 4.15. Is this what you expected?

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mburke5678 ,

Nope. Starting manual-cp process for those 2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants