Skip to content

Bug 1847368: [release-4.5]: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV#25158

Merged
mfojtik merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.5from
enxebre:release-4.5-bug-1847185
Jun 19, 2020
Merged

Bug 1847368: [release-4.5]: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV#25158
mfojtik merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.5from
enxebre:release-4.5-bug-1847185

Conversation

@enxebre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@enxebre enxebre commented Jun 18, 2020

manual cherry-pick for #25121.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@enxebre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847368, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "4.5.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1847185 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1847368: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jun 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@enxebre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847368, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "4.5.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1847185 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1847368: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@enxebre enxebre changed the title Bug 1847368: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV Bug 1847368: [release-4.5]: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV Jun 18, 2020
@enxebre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

enxebre commented Jun 18, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@enxebre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847368, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1847185 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sttts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 18, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 18, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847368, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1847185 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mfojtik mfojtik added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Jun 19, 2020
@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847368, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1847185 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1847185 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 19, 2020
@mfojtik mfojtik added the priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. label Jun 19, 2020
@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere
/override ci/prow/launch-vsphere

vsphere tests are totally unrelated to this change

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere, ci/prow/launch-vsphere

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere
/override ci/prow/launch-vsphere

vsphere tests are totally unrelated to this change

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sttts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sttts commented Jun 19, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@enxebre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

enxebre commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-azure

@enxebre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

enxebre commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-conformance-k8s

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/retest

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure
/override ci/prow/e2e-conformance-k8s
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

button merging as fedoraproject is down, the CI is in flaky state and this is required for ARO.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins, ci/prow/e2e-azure, ci/prow/e2e-conformance-k8s, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure
/override ci/prow/e2e-conformance-k8s
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mfojtik commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/launch-vsphere

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/launch-vsphere

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/launch-vsphere

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mfojtik mfojtik merged commit 36962c8 into openshift:release-4.5 Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@enxebre: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/origin#25158, kubernetes/kubernetes#92166. Bugzilla bug 1847368 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1847368: [release-4.5]: UPSTREAM: 92166: fix: GetLabelsForVolume panic issue for azure disk PV

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants