[release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local #25516

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-09-17T14:55:09Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #25406

/assign aojea

Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@redhat.com>

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-09-17T14:55:14Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Bugzilla bug 1828858 with correct target release. Retitling PR to link to clone:
/retitle [release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1828858: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-09-17T14:55:41Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868490, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1828858 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1828858 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
bug has dependents

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

aojea · 2020-09-17T20:49:37Z

/retest

aojea · 2020-09-18T06:35:35Z

/retest

aojea · 2020-09-28T09:38:11Z

/retest

sgreene570 · 2020-09-30T14:13:48Z

/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-09-30T16:25:51Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-cmd	`d417bbd`	link	`/test e2e-cmd`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial	`d417bbd`	link	`/test e2e-aws-serial`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

frobware · 2020-10-21T10:35:07Z

/retest

aojea · 2020-10-21T13:05:32Z

/retest
/assign @knobunc

knobunc · 2020-10-22T12:19:08Z

/approve

knobunc · 2020-10-22T12:19:27Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-22T12:19:47Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: knobunc, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/OWNERS~~ [knobunc]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

aojea · 2020-10-23T08:51:22Z

/retest

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T15:55:05Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T16:08:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

bparees · 2020-10-23T17:57:07Z

we had a surprising number of urgent PRs come in for 4.5 today, so i'm making room by untagging this, it should be CPA'd next week.

aojea · 2020-10-27T09:04:01Z

it is a duplicate of #25481 , isn't it?
why CI does not show a conflict?

sgreene570 · 2020-10-27T13:55:38Z

it is a duplicate of #25481 , isn't it?
why CI does not show a conflict?

Yea, looks like it.
https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-4.5/test/e2e/upgrade/service/service.go#L53
Strange that this is passing CI...
@aojea we can close this PR, right?

aojea · 2020-10-27T14:04:35Z

/close
the commit is in release-4.5 per 28f3eaa

Strange that this is passing CI...

🤷

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-27T14:04:54Z

@aojea: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
the commit is in release-4.5 per 28f3eaa

Strange that this is passing CI...

🤷

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-27T14:04:56Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered removing this pull request from the external tracker bugs for bug 1868490 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 1004: The combination of ext_type_* fields matched more than one External Tracker.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

use ExternalTrafficPolicy local for zero downtime

d417bbd

Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@redhat.com>

openshift-ci-robot assigned aojea Sep 17, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2020

Bug 1828858: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local #25406

Merged

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.5] Bug 1828858: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local~~ [release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local Sep 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from ericavonb and soltysh September 17, 2020 14:55

openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2020

Bug 1868490: upgrade test use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local #25481

Merged

openshift-ci-robot assigned knobunc Oct 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 22, 2020

bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 22, 2020

bparees removed the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot closed this Oct 27, 2020

[release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local #25516

[release-4.5] Bug 1868490: use LoadBalancers with ExternalTrafficPolicy set to Local #25516

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Sep 17, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Sep 18, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Sep 28, 2020

Uh oh!

sgreene570 commented Sep 30, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 30, 2020

Uh oh!

frobware commented Oct 21, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Oct 21, 2020

Uh oh!

knobunc commented Oct 22, 2020

Uh oh!

knobunc commented Oct 22, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Oct 23, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

Uh oh!

bparees commented Oct 23, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

sgreene570 commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

aojea commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants